Perspective of Virtual Exhibition during the COVID-19 pandemic

Finta Lissimia, Lutfi Prayogi

Abstract


Virtual exhibitions are growing driven by physical restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The exhibition of works that were previously more physical in nature, can be visited physically is slowly turning into an exhibition that is visited virtually. This change is uncomfortable for the community. For this reason, a study is needed on the impact of virtual exhibition visits on the community during the COVID-19 restrictions. This study aims to answer these problems and at the same time evaluate the progress of virtual exhibitions in the early days of the pandemic. Collecting data using an online questionnaire on 49 architecture students. The results of the questionnaire were analyzed using distribution and content analysis for open-ended questions. Exhibition content is the main focus. in a virtual exhibition. Other aspects to consider are virtual quality, exhibition perception, and execution. Restrictions cause boredom and stress. Virtual exhibitions can help overcome these feelings. Virtual exhibitions are not a substitute for physical exhibitions because people do not feel the need to refrain from visiting virtual exhibitions. Professionals feel motivated to visit any exhibition whether physical or virtual. So virtual exhibitions function like physical exhibitions, the only difference is the impression and experience that visitors get

Keywords


restrictions, the pandemic, virtual exhibitions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Torres Martín, C., Acal, C., El Honrani, M., & Mingorance Estrada, Á. C. (2021). Impact on the Virtual Learning Environment Due to COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(2), 582.

Dobricki, M., Kim, K. G., Coppi, A. E., Dillenbourg, P., & Cattaneo, A. (2021). Perceived educational usefulness of a virtual-reality work situation depends on the spatial human-environment relation. Research in Learning Technology, 29.

Rudi, J. (2021). Designing Soundscapes for Presence in Virtual Reality Exhibitions: A Study of Visitor Experiences. Visitor Studies, 1-26.

Yang, T., Lai, I. K. W., Fan, Z. B., & Mo, Q. M. (2021). The impact of a 360° virtual tour on the reduction of psychological stress caused by COVID-19. Technology in Society, 64, 101514.

Reese, G., Kohler, E., & Menzel, C. (2021). Restore or get restored: The effect of control on stress reduction and restoration in virtual nature settings. Sustainability, 13(4),

Reese, G., Stahlberg, J., & Menzel, C. (2021). Digital shinrin-yoku: Do nature experiences in virtual reality reduce stress and increase well-being as strongly as similar experiences in a physical forest?. Preprint

Williams, J., & Howarth, K. Learning pains: practical considerations in migrating exercise physiology labs to a virtual environment during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The FASEB Journal, 35.

Serafin, S. (2004) Sound Design to Enhance Presence in Photoreaslistic Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on AuditoryDisplay, Sidney, Australia

Höfler, C. (2021) Image Contact Haptic Actions in Virtual Spaces. Game| World| Architectonics, 217.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Drabble, D., Simeone, L., Iacopini, G., Morelli, N., & De Götzen, A. (2021). Applying Theory of Change to strategy articulation cycles in design projects: Potentials and shortcomings through the Designscapes case study. Strategic Design Research Journal, 14(2), 438-455.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/ijbesr.6.1.45-54

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research



Indexed on:

 Garba Rujukan Digital(Garuda)

Powered by Puskom-UMJ