Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Statement: Pengujian Fraud Heptagon Theory

Siti Azizah, Reskino Reskino

Abstract


Objectives. This study aims to examine Reskino's (2022) heptagon fraud theory, which encompasses seven dimensions: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, arrogance, culture, and religiosity.

Design/method/approach. Data was collected through purposive sampling, wherein questionnaires were distributed to auditors in DKI Jakarta. A total of 117 respondents completed the questionnaires, and subsequently analyzed using SEM-PLS.

Result/findings. The results show that pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and competence do not have a significant impact on detecting fraudulent financial statements. On the other hand, arrogance, culture, and religiosity are revealed to exert a strong influence in this regard.

Theoretical contribution. This study represents the inaugural examination of the most recent fraud theory, known as the fraud heptagon theory, formulated by Reskino (2022). The primary aim is to address the existing gap in the literature, which lacks an explanation for fraud occurrences attributed to religious and cultural factors.

Practical contribution. The anticipated outcome of this research is to provide valuable insights that could serve as input for regulators in formulating regulations that consider the influence of religion and culture.

Limitations. This study solely relies on primary data gathered from the perspectives of auditors operating in the DKI Jakarta region. Consequently, the research scope is limited, making it inappropriate to generalize the findings to auditors outside the DKI Jakarta area.

 


Keywords


Culture, fraudulent financial statement, fraud heptagon theory, religiosity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agusputri, H., & Sofie, S. (2019). Faktor - Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 14(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v14i2.5049

Ahriati, D., Basuki, P., & Widiastuty, E. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Perilaku Tidak Etis dan Kesesuaian Kompensasi terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Jurnal InFestasi, 11(1), 41–55.

Albrecht, W.S. (2012). Fraud Examination. South Western. Cengage Learning.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Indonesia. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. Acfe Indonesia Chapter, 1–76. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/

Ayem, S., Wardani, D. K., & Mas’adah, L. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement dengan Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 5(2), 911–930. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v5i2.1355

Bachtiar, I. H., & Ela Elliyana. (2020). Determinan upaya pencegahan fraud pemerintah desa. Imanensi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi Islam, 5(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.34202/imanensi.5.2.2020.61-68

Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M., & Christina Daat, S. (2018). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114–134.

Budiyono, I., & Arum, M. S. D. (2020). Determinants in detecting fraud triangle of financial statements on companies registered in Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) period 2012-2018. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 2(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2020.2.1.4818

Cahyadi, M. F., & Sujana, E. (2020). Pengaruh Religiusitas, Integritas, dan Penegakan Peraturan Terhadap Fraud pada Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 10(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v10i2.25919

Cahyanti, D., & Wahidahwati. (2020). Analisis Fraud Pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 9(4), 1–24.

Carla, C., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Fraud Pentagon. Ultimaccounting : Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 13(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v13i1.1857

Chairun, N., & Pipin, F. (2021). Tingkat Religiusitas Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Madani Balikpapan. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 3(2), 6.

Christian, N., Basri, Y. Z. (2019). Analysis of Fraud Triangle , Theory to Detecting Corporate Fraud in Indonesia. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3(4), ISSN 2581-3889.

Demetriades, P., & Owusu-Agyei, S. (2022). Fraudulent financial reporting: an application of fraud diamond to Toshiba’s accounting scandal. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(2), 729–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2021-0108

Desviana, D., Basri, Y. M., & Nasrizal, N. (2020). Analisis Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.3.1.50-73

Dhany, U. R., Priantono, S., & Budianto, M. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Peminimalisiran Fraud (Kecurangan) Pengadaan Barang/jasa Pada DPU Kota Probolinggo. Jurnal Ecobuss, 4(2), 46–60.

Dinata, R. O., Irianto, G., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2018). Menyingkap Budaya Penyebab Fraud: Studi Etnografi Di Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jurnal Economia, 14(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v14i1.18453

Dolinšek, T., & Lutar-Skerbinjek, A. (2018). Voluntary disclosure of financial information on the internet by large companies in Slovenia. Kybernetes, 47(3), 458–473.

Dwi Maryadi, A., Puspa Midiastuty, P., Suranta, E., & Robiansyah, A. (2020). Pengaruh fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 2(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v2i1.104

Endah, D., Probowati, P., Chariri, A., & Isgiyarta, J. (2023). Hedonism, Religiosity, and Fraud In Financial. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 7(1), 86–104.

Fathmaningrum, E. S., & Anggarani, G. (2021). Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 22(3), 625–646. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v22i3.12538

Fitri, F., & Nadirsyah, N. (2020). Pengaruh Tekanan (Pressure), Kesempatan (Opportunity), Rasionalisasi (Rationalization), Dan Kapabilitas (Capability) Terhadap Kecurangan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Pemerintahan Aceh Dengan Pemoderasi Budaya Etis Organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimeka.v5i1.15437

Fullerton, R., & Durtschi, C. (2011). The Effect of Professional Skepticism on the Fraud Detection Skills of Internal Auditors. SSRN Electronic Journal, 435. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.617062

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Handoko, B. L., & Natasya. (2019). Fraud diamond model for fraudulent financial statement detection. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 6865–6872. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5838.098319

Haqq, A. P. N. A., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2019). Fraud Pentagon For Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i3.1788.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id

Hidayah, E., & Saptarini, G. D. (2019). Pentagon fraud analysis in detecting potential financial statement fraud of banking companies in Indonesia. Proceeding Uii-Icabe, 89–102.

Himawan, F. A., & Wijanarti, R. S. (2020). F . Agung Himawan dan Restu Sapta Wijanarti : Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap …” 138. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 23(2), 137–154.

Imtikhani, L., & Sukirman, S. (2021). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 19(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v19i1.3654

Indrapraja, M. Haykal Daditullah, Agusti, Restu, Mela, N. F. (2021). Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 1(1), 131–148.

Indriyani, E., & Suryandari, D. (2021). Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statement Through Pentagon Theory With Audit Committee As Moderating. EAJ (Economic and Accounting Journal), 4(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.32493/eaj.v4i1.y2021.p35-47

Istifadah, R. U., & Senjani, Y. P. (2020). Religiosity as the moderating effect of diamond fraud and personal ethics on fraud tendencies. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 2(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2020.2.1.4712

Jalaluddin. (2010). Psikologi Agama - Memahami Perilaku dengan Mengaplikasikan Prinsip-prinsip Psikologi. RajaGrafindo Persada, 412.

Jaunanda, M., & Silaban, D. P. (2020). Pengujian Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Resiko Financial Fraudulent Reporting. Ultima Management : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 12(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.31937/manajemen.v12i2.1581

Kurrohman, T., & Widyayanti, P. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan ( Fraud ) di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri. 2(2), 116–125.

Lev, B. (2018). The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research, 48(5), 465–493.

Luhri, A. S. R. N., Mashuri, A. A. S., & Ermaya, H. N. L. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 3(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v3i1.481

Marks. (2011). The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements. United States of America: Crowe Horwath LLP, 1–62. https://www.fraudconference.com/uploadedFiles/Fraud_Conference

Maulidiana, S., & Triandi, T. (2020). Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Through the Fraud Pentagon Theory. 143(Isbest 2019), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200522.042

Megawati, & Reskino. (2023). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal , Whistleblowing System, Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan Dengan Moralitas Individu Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 0832, 31–50.

Mita, N. K., & Indraswarawati, S. A. P. A. (2021). Pengaruh Religius, Moralitas Individu, dan Efektivitas Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud) Akuntansi (Studi Empiris Pada LPD Se-Kecamatan Gianyar). Hita: Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(2), 297–312.

Mujib, A. (2018). Sharia Fraud Model: The Fraud in the Circle of Faith. UNEJ E-Proceeding, 275–285.

Mulyandani, V. C., & Rahayu, S. (2021). The Role Of Fraud Pentagon Theory In Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements In Banking Companies Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange In 2017-2019. American International Journal of Business Management (AIJBM), 4(09), 22–27.

Murdiansyah, I. (2022). Religious Accountant as Fraud Reducer. International Journal of Religious and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.34199/ijracs.2022.04.011

Nassir Zadeh, F., Salehi, M., & Shabestari, H. (2018). The relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and internet financial reporting in Iran. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(6), 1021–1041.

Ninda Vacumi, H. (2022). Pengaruh Religiusitas dan. 4(3), 563–573.

Noorjamil, K. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Fraudulent Financial Statement) (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan yang Terdaftardi Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2017). Prosiding Manajeman, 5(1), 442–448.

Nugroho, D., & Diyanty, V. (2022). Hexagon Fraud in Fraudulent Financial Statements: the Moderating Role of Audit Committee. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 19(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2022.03

Nurardi, D., & Wijayanti, R. (2021). Determinan Financial Statement Fraud Dengan Analisis Fraud Hexagon Model (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor LQ 45 yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode II Agustus-Januari 2016-2019) Desnanda. The 13th University Research Colloqium 2021, 2019(3), 430–441.

Oktaviany, F., & Reskino. (2023). Financial Statement Fraud : Pengujian Fraud Hexagon dengan Moderasi Audit Committee. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 25(1), 91–118.

Omar, N., Johari, Z. A., & Hasnan, S. (2015). Corporate Culture and the Occurrence of Financial Statement Fraud: A Review of Literature. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31(15), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01211-3

Ozcelik, H. (2020). An analysis of fraudulent financial reporting using the fraud diamond theory perspective: an empirical study on the manufacturing sector companies listed on the Borsa Istanbul. In Contemporary Issues in Audit Management and Forensic Accounting. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Purnamasari, P., & Amaliah, I. (2015). Fraud Prevention: Relevance to Religiosity and Spirituality in the Workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.109

Pusphita, M. Y., & Yassa, G. W. (2018). Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting ( Study on Indonesian Capital Market ). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 42(5), 93–109. http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied

Puteri, N. N., & Reskino. (2023). Fraudulent Financial Statements Analysis Using Hexagon Fraud Approach With Audit Committee As Moderating Variable. International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI), 12(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.35629/8028-12013548

Rafinda, A., Agus Pramuka, B., & Indira Kusuma, P. D. (2013). The Trend and Variation of Intellectual Capital Disclosure At Bank Industries in Europe. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy | Ventura, 16(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v16i1.128

Rahman, A., Deliana, D., & Rihaney, N. (2020). Detection Of Financial Statement Fraud Triangle (Fraud Triangle) In LQ45 Companies Listed Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Technical Vocational and Engineering Technology, 2(1), 70–78.

Rahmatika, D. N., Kartikasari, M. D., & Indriasih, D. (2019). Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statement ; Can Perspective of Fraud Diamond Theory be applied to Property , Real Estate , and Building Construction Companies in Indonesia ? EJMR, European Journal of Business and Management Research, 4(6), 1–9.

Reskino, & Bilkis, M. S. (2022). Apakah Good Corporate Governance Memoderasi Hubungan Kecenderungan Kecurangan Manajemen Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement? Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 6(2), 280–305.

Rifdayanti, A. A., Wahyudi, T., & Yusnaini, Y. (2020). Determinant of Fraud and Unethical Behavior as Intervening Variable on Local Government in Indonesia. Облiк i Фiнанси, 4, 130–143.

Rizani, F., & Respati, N. W. (2018). Factors influencing the presentation of fraudulent financial reporting in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1 (31)), 254–264.

Rukmana, H. S. (2018). Pentagon Fraud Effect on Financial Statement Fraud and Firm Value. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 16(5), 118–122.

Rustandy, T., Sukmadilaga, C., & Irawady, C. (2020). Pencegahan Fraud Melalui Budaya Organisasi, Good Corporate Governance Dan Pengendalian Internal. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi & Keuangan, 8(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v8i2.24125

Said, J., Rafidi, M., Asry, S., Obaid, R., & Alam, M. (2018). Integrating Religiosity into Fraud Triangle Theory: Empirical Findings from Enforcement Officers. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 2018.

Sangkala, M., & Safitri, N. (2021). Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements in Pharmaceutical Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Proceedings of the International Conference on Social, Economics, Business, and Education (ICSEBE 2021), 205, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220107.040

Sari, M. P., & Hadiprajitno, P. B. (2013). Pengawasan impelementasi “. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing, 9(2), 169–198.

Sari, S. P., & Khoiriah, N. (2021). Hexagon Fraud Detection of Regional Government Financial Statement as A Fraud Prevention on The Pandemic Crisis Era. Wacana.Ub.Ac.Id, 24(2), 90–96.

Satria Rukmana, H. (2021). Determinants of Pentagon Fraud in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud and Company Value. Majalah Ilmiah Bijak, 18(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.31334/bijak.v18i1.1345

Septriani, Y., & Desi Handayani, dan. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. 11(1), 11–23. http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id

Setianingsih, R., & Fadilah, S. (2020). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Prosiding Akuntansi, 6(2), 364–369.

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results

Sihombing, T., & Cahyadi, C. C. (2021). the Effect of Fraud Diamond on Fraudulent Financial Statement in Asia Pacific Companies. Ultimaccounting : Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 13(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v13i1.2031

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13(99), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005

Supri, Z., Rura, Y., & Pontoh, G. T. (2018). Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statements with Fraud Diamond. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Business and Management, 6(5), 2347–3002.

Susanti, D. (2018). The Analysis of Traangle Fraud Factors to Fraudulent Financial Statement. Indonesian Journal of Business, Accounting and Management, 1(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.36406/ijbam.v1i1.219

Thamlim, W., & Reskino. (2023). Fraudulent Financial Reporting with Fraud Pentagon Perspective: The Role of Corporate Governance as Moderator. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 07(01), 18–38.

Uciati, N., & Mukhibad, H. (2019). Fraudulent Financial Statements at Sharia Banks. Accounting Analysis Journal, 8(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v8i3.33625

Urumsah, D., Wicaksono, A. P., & Hardinto, W. (2018). Pentingkah Nilai Religiusitas dan Budaya Organisasi untuk Mengurangi Kecurangan? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 9(1), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2018.04.9010

Wahyuni, D., Mariya, Irman, M., & Okalesa. (2022). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements Using Pentagon’s Fraud Approach in Banking Sub Sector Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange 2015- 2019. Jurnal Akuntansi, Kewirausahaan Dan Bisnis, 7(2), 145–162.

Wahyuni, W., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2017). Fraud Triangle Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v21i1.133

Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2018). Financial Accounting with International Financial Reporting Standards. John Wiley & Sons.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42. doi: DOI:raud Diamond : Considering the Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

www.fraud-magazine.com. (2021). 5 Most Scandalous Frauds of 2020. Diakses pada 20 Maret 2023, dari https://www.fraud-magazine.com/article.aspx?id=4295012581

Zulaikha, Z., & Hadiprajitno, P. T. B. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Procurement Fraud: Sebuah Kajian Dari Perspektif Persepsian Auditor Eksternal. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(2), 194–220. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2016.11




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/jago.4.1.17-37

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance Indexed by:

Google ScholarGarba Rujukan Digital(Garuda)CrossrefBielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)


Copyright of Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance (e-ISSN:2745-4711).

Crossref logo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Powered by Puskom-UMJ