Value Chain Analysis Indonesian Animal Husbandry Industry

Kotim Subandi, Hermawan Hermawan, Adriana Sari Aryani

Abstract


At least until 2017, a very low production capacity coupled with livestock methods that are still traditional causes almost all major livestock commodities in Indonesia to close their deficits through imports. Meat, milk, eggs, and even the skin, all of them still cannot be fulfilled entirely from the country.As much as 83% of raw material for the dairy industry is imported. Leather processing industry, importing raw materials for cow leather by 3 million pieces and 13.5 million pieces (sheep and goat skin). Specifically for beef, it was noted that 2016 was the highest volume of beef imports reaching 132.74 thousand tons. As for eggs in general, the pattern of development of export volume is lower than the rate of imports per year. Data on chicken meat imports and their values during the 2012-2016 period showed quite high values compared to export volumes. Knowledge of industry value chains is needed to explore the gap in the dependence of imported raw materials.The value chain analysis carried out in the livestock base industry chain shows a map of the relationship between a number of livestock industry bases in Indonesia so as to facilitate the breakdown of dependence on raw materials. Analysis carried out on the main chain (livestock base) and joint chain (supporting base). Five farm-based industry value chains have been assembled, namely: 1) beef-cattle base industry; 2) industrial livestock-poultry meat base; 3) dairy-based livestock industry; 4) leather-based industry base; and 5) egg-based livestock industry. Core industries or prime movers namely: a) RPH on beef chains, b) industrial pasteurization in the milk chain; c) tanning industry on leather chains; d) food freezing industry on chicken meat chains; and e) egg packing house on the egg chain. The existence of the core industry greatly determines the position of the raw materials of the downstream industry.


Keywords


Industrial livestock base,Industrial value chain,Prime remover industry.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abid, T. 2010. Potensi pemanfaatan wol lokal sebagai bahan subtitusi serbuk gergaji untuk meningkatkan stabilitas dimensi dan sifat innsulasi papan partikel. Skripsi Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Bangga T.R. N.K. Agrawal, S.C. Sharma. 2002. Industrial Engineering and Management Science. Khanna Publishers. New Delhi.

Departemen Perindustrian RI. 2009. Roadmap Industri Susu. Dirjen Industri Agro dan Kimia, Departemen Perindustrian, Jakarta.

Duldjaman, M., Wiradarya, T.R., & Muttaqin M.I.H. 2006. Daya pintal dan kekuatan Benang bulu domba priangan dan peranakan merino. Media Peternakan. 29(3) Hal. 187-192

Edriss, M. A., Dashab, G., Ghareh, A. A. A., Nilforooshan, M. A., &Movassagh, H. 2007. A study on some physical attributes of naeni sheep wool for textile industry. Pakistan J. Bio. Sci.10(3) Pp. 415-420

Energy Information Administration. 2000. World Energy Consumption. United States Energy Information Administration, New York.

FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nation. 2003.National Report on Animal Genetic Resources Indonesia.Roma (IT): FAO. [diakses 2 November 2013]. Tersedia pada: http://ftp.fao. org/docrep/fao/010/a1250e/annexes CountryReports/Indonesia.pdf.

Grant, J.L. 2003. Foundation of Economic Value Added. John Willey & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey.

Hadiguna, RA, 2016, Manajemen Rantai Pasok Agroindustri: Pendekatan Berkelanjutan untuk Pengukuran Kinerja dan Penilaian Risiko. Andalas University Press, Padang.

Kaplinsky, R and M. Morris. 2000. A Handbook For Value Chain Research. Bellagio Workshop in September 2000

Kementerian Pertanian. 2017a. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian- Sub Sektor Peternakan : Daging ayam buras. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta.

Kementerian Pertanian. 2017b. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian-Sub Sektor Peternakan : Daging ayam ras. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta.

Kementerian Pertanian. 2017c. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian-Sub Sektor Peternakan : Daging sapi. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta

Kementerian Pertanian. 2017d. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian-Sub Sektor Peternakan : Telor. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta

Kementerian Pertanian. 2017e. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian-Sub Sektor Peternakan : Susu Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta

Knight, J. dan S. Satchell. 2002. Performance Measurement in Finance : firm, funds, and managers. Butterworth –Heinemann, Oxford.

Nang’ole, E., D. Mithöfer and S. Franzel. 2011. Review of guidelines and manuals for value chain analysis for agricultural and forest products. Published by the World Agroforestry Centre United Nations Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya

Talib, C., I. Inounu., dan A. Bamualim. 2007. Retrukturisasi Peternakan di Indonesia. Analisa Kebijakan Pertanian Vol.5 No.1 Pp. 1-14

Yusdja, Y., N. Ilham, dan W.K.Sejati. 2003. Profil dan Permasalahan Peternakan. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pp. 44-56




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/jasat.2.1.21-28

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright of Journal of Applied Sciences and Advanced Technology (JASAT)

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Journal Statistic

Powered by Puskom-UMJ