Implementing the Pancasila Student Profile and Augmented Reality Apps to comprehend Indonesian Traditional Houses

Devi Diafani Dishinta, Mohamad Affan Basyaiban


The Pancasila Student Profile is a new learning reference in the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum, so teachers must use various kinds of learning media that can develop creativity and critical power for grade IV students. This study aims to intensify related to the Pancasila Student Profile itself. Then what are the impacts or implications resulting from this Pancasila Student Profile, especially the implications for students' personal resilience. Quantitative research with design one group control experiment. Data collection techniques using questionnaire, observation, and test instruments in the form of post-test pre-tests, sampling with saturated sampling with a total sample of 23 students. The results showed that the results of the application of the Pancasila Student Profile combined with the Augmented Reality application had very good results for student learning. Students who are given pre-test and post-test have much different results. When given the pre-test, the accumulated value is 78, after being given a pre-test, the author implements the AR application to find out if there are changes that occur in learning. However, after the implementation of the AR application and being given a post-test, the score of grade IV students rose until the accumulation reached 90. That is, it indicates that the application of the Pancasila Student Profile with six different indicators must be applied with a variety of learning that attracts the attention of students. So that students do not feel confused to understand learning based on the Pancasila Student Profile. 


Agung, Rr et al. 2020. “The Role of Teachers Communication Through The Pattern.”Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8(1): 595–601.

Anthony, Laurence, and Barredo Labadan. 2021. “Coaching Styles, Motivation, and Sports Performance Laurence Anthony Barredo Labadan.” 8(I): 1–13.

Augustine, Greg. “The Impact of Gender Performance on Competency Evaluations of Women Candidates.”

Brömdal, Annette, and Ian Davis. 2020. Inclusive Theory and Practice in Special Education The Pedagogical Possibilities of Critically Examining Gender and Sexuality in InitialTeacher Education Through the Lens of Intersex.

Byrd, Kelsey Louise. 2018. “Coaching Styles and the Basic Psychological Need Fulfillment of College Athletes.” San Luis Obispo. Capozzi, Michelle L. 2013. “Social Work and Coaching

Styles.” Undergraduate Research 2:1–7. s

Coleman, Priscilla K, and Katherine Hildebrandt Karraker. 2000. “Parenting Self-Efficacy among Mothers of School-Age Children: Conceptualization , Measurement , and Correlates Published by: National Council on Family Relations Stable URL: Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/585698 Linked References Are Available on JSTOR Fo.”Family Relations 49(1): 13–24.

Cornett, Jake, and Jim Knight. 2009. “Research on Coaching.” Coaching: Approaches and Perspectives: 192–216.

Creighton, Theodore, and Virginia Tech. 2010. “School Leadership Coaching: What.” : 1–6.Crouch,

Margaret A et al. 2020. “Feminism and Philosophy: Parenting and Philosophy.”

Spring 13(2): 3–5.

Davidson, James. 2021. “‘Who Am I to Tell Them How to Coach’: A Critical Analysis of the

Work and Learning of Coach Developers in Aotearoa, New Zealand.” 1994.

Dymond, Simon et al. 2008. “Derived Avoidance Learning: Transformation of Avoidance Response Functions in Accordance with Same and Opposite Relational Frames.” Psychological Record 58(2): 269–86.

Elizabeth Graham. 2016. “What Patterns of Teacher- Student Verbal Communication Exist in My Classroom?”


/ enc2432/2432_ch4.htm.

Frizelle, K.L. 2020. “The Personal Is Pedagogical (?): Personal Narratives and Embodiment

as Teaching Strategies in Higher Education.” South African Journal of Higher Education34(2): 17–35.

Garmston, Robert. 1993. “Reflections of Cognitive Coaching.” Educational Leadership 51(2): 57–61. Golomb, Mayana, Maurizio Fava, Melissa Abraham, and Jerrold F. Rosenbaum. 1995. “Gender

Differences in Personality Disorders.” American Journal of Psychiatry 152(4):579–82. Grant, Anthony M., L. S. Green, and Josephine Rynsaardt. 2010. “Developmental Coaching for High School Teachers: Executive Coaching Goes to School.” Consulting

PsychologyJournal 62(3): 151–68.

Harmat, Gal. 2020. 5 Intersectional Pedagogy: Creative Education Practices for Gender andPeace Work.

Haug, Mona. 2011. “International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Special Issue No What Is the Relationship between Coaching Interventions and Team Effectiveness?” 5(September).

Haugan, Jan Arvid, Frode Moen, Maja Olsen Østerås, and Frode Stenseng. 2021. “Effects of a Mentor Program for Coaches on the Coach-Athlete Relationship.” Sports 9(8): 1–14.

Hedges, Sarah Savage. 2021. “Instructional Coaches ’ Perspectives on Preparations for the Role as Coach.”

Hjelmér, Carina. 2020. “Free Play, Free Choices?–Influence and Construction of Gender inPreschools in Different Local Contexts.” Education Inquiry 11(2):

–58. Hoffman, Leslie A. et al. 2016. “Is Reflective Ability Associated with Professionalism

Lapsesduring Medical School?” Academic Medicine 91(6): 853–57.

Huff, Casey-may. 2019. “Coaching Styles , Athletes ’ Needs Satisfaction , and Identity: AnAnalysis of Athlete-Coach Relationship.” Electronic Theses and Dissertations


Hussien, Abdelaziz M. 2020. “The Impact of Combining Communicative Traits of Writing

with Cooperative Learning on Trainee Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge and Attitudes.” International Journal of Instruction 13(1): 813–930.

Id, Submission. 2020. “Mberdayaan _ Kompetensi _ Pedagogik _ Berbasis _ Kem Ampuan _ Reflektif .Pdf.”

Jatiningsih, Oksiana, and Maya Mustika Kartika Sari. 2020. “‘Gender and Education’: Preparing Teacher Candidates of Civics to Build Egalitarian Society in Industry 4.0 Era.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 418(Acec 2019):227– 32.

Jeelani, By Farheen, Gregory Fantham, and Marais Bester. 2020. “Exploring Coaching Style Preference through Conversations about Coaching and Personality.” Coaching Psykologi - The Danish Journal of Coaching Psychology 9(1): 9–22.

Jenderal, Direktorat, and Pendidikan Tinggi. 2020. Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar - KampusMerdeka. Jones, Kevin. 2020. Coaching Styles and Its Effect on Team Performance.

Kadir, Asnia Kadir. 2021. “The Effects of Coaching and Mentoring on MetacognitionKnowledge Among Malay Language Teachers in Sabah, Malaysia.” American International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research 4(1): 18–30.

Kaser, Linda, and Judy Halbert. 2014. “Creating and Sustaining Inquiry Spaces for Teacher Learning and System Transformation.” European Journal of Education 49(2): 206–17.

Keddie, Amanda, and Doris Bartel. 2020. “The Affective Intensities of Gender Transformative Work: An Actionable Framework for Facilitators Working with Boys and Young Men.” Men and Masculinities: 1–15.

Koopman, Ruud, Paula Danskin Englis, Michel L. Ehgrenhard, and Aard Groen. 2021. “The Chronological Development OfCoaching and Mentoring: Side by SideDisciplines.” International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring 19(1): 137–51.

Kovacs, Helena. 2018. “Change, Challenge, Transformation: A Qualitative Inquiry into Transformative Teacher Learning.” Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal 8(3):99–118.

Kumala, Vivi May, Barbara B Levin, and Lynne Schrum. 2019. “Analisis konstruk model pengembangan kepemimpinan guru dari faktor spiritualitas kerja di sekolah dasar ‘ X ’ Jakarta York-Barr.”Education Of Research: 1–15.

Kurni, Dena Kaifal, and Ratnawati Susanto. 2018. “Pengaruh Keterampilan Manajemen Kelas Terhadap Kualitas Proses Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar Pada Kelas Tinggi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 2(1): 39–45. http://www.universitas-

Lilia Senja Ilyandani, Ratnawati Susanto. 2019. “Lilia: Pengaruh Kemampuan.. *Dosen Universitas Esa Unggul 120.” ESJ (Elementary School Journal) 8(3): 120–28. Linley, P. et al. 2010. “Using Signature Strengths in Pursuit of Goals: Effects in Goal

Progress, Need Satisfaction and Well-Being and Implications for Coaching Psychologists.”

International Coaching Psychology Review 5(1): 6–15.

Love, Kayla. 2020. “The Perceived Effectiveness of Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling

Coaching Styles.”

Manzoor, Mehwish. 2018. “Role of Coach Encouragement between Athlete’s Interest,

Motivation and Frequency of Participation: A Case Study of District of Sialkot.” Global

Physical Education & Sports Sciences Review I(I): 20–26.

Masood ul Hassan. 2020. “Education for Women Entrepreneurial Attitudesand Intentions: The

Role of Perceptions on Gender Equality and Empowerment.” Pakistan Journal of Commerce

and Social Sciences 14(1): 63–98.

Marcone, Michael S. 2017. “The Impact of Coaching Styles on the Motivation and

Performances of Athletes.” Kinesiology, Sports Studies, and Physical Education 21: 34.

Marjon, M., and K. U.Z. Nugroho. 2019. “The Competence of Teachers Based on Academic

Qualification and Gender.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1318(1): 0–9. Nadeak, Multi et al. 2021. “Understanding the Links between Coaching, OCB, and Individual Performance among MSME Employees.” International Journal of Social and Management

Studies 01(04): 65–80. Nazarudin, Mohamad et al. 2009. “Coaching Leadership Styles and Athlete Satisfactions among Malaysian University Basketball Team.” Research Journal of International

Studies 9(1): 4–11.

Pesca, Andréa Duarte et al. 2017. “Measuring Coaching Efficacy: A Theoretical Review.” Revista de Psicologia del Deporte 27(4): 103–9.

Pramono, Firdanianty. 2020. “Analysis of the Family’s Communication Pattern and the Benefits of Mother School Program for Building a Harmonious Family.” Informasi50(1): 1–14.

Rachbini, Widarto;, and Didik J Rachbini. 2020. 53 Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Metode Riset Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (Analisis Regresi - SPSS & SEM - LIsrel).

Rahayu, Reka, and Ratnawati Susanto. 2018. “Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Guru Dan Keterampilan Manajemen Kelas Terhadap Perilaku Belajar Siswa Kelas Iv.” JurnalPenelitian Pendidikan Dasar: 4(2): 220–29.

Ratnawati Susanto; Reza R; Widarto R. 2020. “Technological and Pedagogical Model: Analysis of Factors and Measurement of Learning Outcomes in Education.” Journal ofEthnic and Cultural Studies 7(2): 1–14. http://www.ejecs/index.php/JECS/aerticle/view/311.

Remington-Doucette, Sonya, and Sheryl Musgrove. 2015. “Variation in Sustainability Competency Development According to Age, Gender, and Disciplinary Affiliation: Implications for Teaching Practice and Overall Program Structure.” International

Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 16(4): 537–75.

Rolando B. Talon Jr., Joseph R. Carreon, and Gary T. Diragen. 2017. “A Phenomenological

Inquiry Of Gender And Development In The.”

General Emilio Aguinaldo National High School (32).

Rusilowati, Umi, and Wahyudi Wahyudi. 2020. “The Significance of Educator Certification

in Developing Pedagogy, Personality, Social and Professional Competencies.” Advancesin Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 409(SoRes 2019): 446– 51.

Rusnaini. 2021. Intensifikasi Profil Pelajar Pancasila dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ketahanan Pribadi Siswa. JURNAL KETAHANAN NASIONAL Vol. 27, No. 2: 1-20.

Sari, Rodiana Wifia. 2019. PERKEMBANGAN AUGMENTED REALITY SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN DI SEKOLAH DASAR. Seminar Nasional Sains Lingkungan dan Pendidikan Ke-VI:1-9.

Setyono, Langgeng, Abd Qodir Muslim, and Yuyun Pujiastuti. 2021. “Strategies for Facing Environmental Dynamics in the Industrial Age 4.0 Using Learning Organization.” Profit15(02): 14– 23.

Shulman, Lee S. 2020. “Teacher Development: Roles of Domain Expertise and Pedagogical Knowledge.” 21(1): 129–35.

Sluis, Lidewey E C V A N D E R. “The Benefits of Coaching for Employees and Their Organizations.” : 1–33.

Soto, Diego, Juan A. García-Herrero, and Rodrigo J. Carcedo. 2021. “Perception of Coach According to the Role of Starter or Substitute in the Final Stage of the Season.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(12): 1–10.

Stanley, Selwyn. 2016. “Reflective Ability, Empathy, and Emotional Intelligence in Undergraduate Social Work Students: A Cross- Sectional Study from India.” SocialWork Education, 1(1).

Susanto, Ratnawati; Asmi Rozali, Y uli. 2020. Model Pengembangan Kompetensi Pedagogik:Teori, Konsep Dan Konstruk Pengukuran. 1st ed. ed. Yanita Nur Indah Sari. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada (Rajawali Pers).

Susanto, Ratnawati. 2017. “Pengaruh Model Cooperative Learning TipeTeams Games Tournament ( Tgt ) Terhadap Kecerdasan Interpersonal Pada Mata Pelajaran Ips.” 1: 260– 69.

Susanto, Ratnawati. 2018. “Gerakan Literasi Pedagogik Bagi Guru Untuk Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran Di Sdn Duri Kepa 17 Pagi Dan Sdn Jelambar Baru 01 Pagi.” 5(September):

Susanto, Ratnawati. 2018. “Pengkondisian Kesiapan Belajar Untuk Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Dengan Gerakan Senam Otak.” Jurnal Eduscience 3(2):

Susanto, Ratnawati. 2020. Buku Model Pengembangan Kompetensi Pedagogik: Teori, Konsep Dan Konstruk Pengukuran. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Susanto, Ratnawati. 2020. “Pemberdayaan Kompetensi Pedagogik Berbasis Kemampuan Reflektif Untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Interaksi Pembelajaran Di SDN Duri Kepa 03.” International Journal of Community Service Learning 4(2): 125–38.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Powered by Puskom-UMJ