HYDRODYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF JANUS SPHERE AT VARIATIONS OF THE REYNOLDS NUMBER

James Julian, Waridho Iskandar, Fitri Wahyuni

Abstract


The hydrodynamics of the homogeneous and Janus spheres were compared computationally at various Reynolds number variations. The Janus sphere is divided into two parts: slippery, which is set as a free-slip wall, and sticky, which is arranged as a free-slip wall. The equation used is the RANS equation for laminar fluid flow. Research focuses more on hydrodynamic forces and visualization of fluid flow by using velocity contours and streamlines. The domains of computational processes are arranged in a rectangular shape. The Richardson Extrapolation method verifies the mesh and gives the result that the meh variation is within the convergence range. Mesh with 105 elements is used for further computation because it only gives the lowest error of 0.129%. Meanwhile, the validation results show that the computational process can follow the experimental results at 0°≤θ≤80°. The Janus sphere is hydrodynamically better than the homogeneous sphere, where the Cl produced is larger and the Cd produced is smaller. The Janus sphere can prevent separation at a Reynolds number of 20 and reduce the recirculation area at a Reynolds number of 50.


Keywords


free-slip; hydrodynamics; homogen sphere; Janus sphere; no-slip

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bao, H., Yang, W., Ma, D., Song, W., Song, B., 2020. Numerical simulation of flapping airfoil with alula. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles 12.

Cerquaglia, M.L., Deliége, G., Boman, R., Terrapon, V., Ponthot, J.P., 2017. Free-slip boundary conditions for simulating free-surface incompressible flows through the particle finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 110, 921–946.

Dhiman, M., Gupta, R., Reddy, K.A., 2021a. Hydrodynamic interactions between two side-by-side Janus spheres. European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids 87, 61–74.

Dhiman, M., Gupta, R., Reddy, K.A., 2021b. Lift on Janus and stick spheres in laminar channel flow: a computational study. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 35, 659–682.

Harinaldi, Budiarso, Julian, J., 2016. The effect of plasma actuator on the depreciation of the aerodynamic drag on box model. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, p. 040004.

Harinaldi, H., Budiarso, B., Julian, J., WS, A., 2015. Drag Reduction in Flow Separation Using Plasma Actuator in a Cylinder Model.

Harinaldi, Kesuma, M.D., Irwansyah, R., Julian, J., Satyadharma, A., 2020. Flow control with multi-DBD plasma actuator on a delta wing. Evergreen 7, 602–608.

Harinaldi, W., Adhika, S., Julian, J., 2019. The comparison of an analytical, experimental, and simulation approach for the average induced velocity of a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD). In: The 10th International Meeting of Advances in Thermofluids (IMAT 2018): Smart City: Advances in Thermofluid Technology in Tropical Urban Development. p. 020027.

Iskandar, W., Julian, J., Wahyuni, F., Ferdyanto, F., Prabu, H.K., Yulia, F., 2022. Study of Airfoil Characteristics on NACA 4415 with Reynolds Number Variations. International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS) 15, 162.

Julian, J., Difitro, R., Stefan, P., 2016a. The effect of plasma actuator placement on drag coefficient reduction of Ahmed body as an aerodynamic model. International Journal of Technology 7, 306–313.

Julian, J., Harinaldi, Budiarso, Wang, C.-C., Chern, M.-J., 2018. Effect of plasma actuator in boundary layer on flat plate model with turbulent promoter. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 232, 3001–3010.

Julian, J., Harinaldi, H., Budiarso, B., 2016b. THE EFFECT OF PLASMA ACTUATOR UTILIZATION TO THE REDUCTION OF AERODYNAMIC DRAG OF CYLINDER AND BOX MODELS.

Julian, J., Iskandar, W., Wahyuni, F., 2022a. Aerodynamics Improvement of NACA 0015 by Using Co-Flow Jet. International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research 7.

Julian, J., Iskandar, W., Wahyuni, F., 2022b. Effect of Single Slat and Double Slat on Aerodynamic Performance of NACA 4415, International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research.

Julian, J., Iskandar, W., Wahyuni, F., Bunga, N.T., 2022c. Characterization of the Co-Flow Jet Effect as One of the Flow Control Devices. Jurnal Asiimetrik: Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa & Inovasi 185–192.

Julian, J., Iskandar, W., Wahyuni, F., Ferdyanto, F., 2022d. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS BASED ON THE FLUID FLOW SEPARATION POINT ON THE UPPER SIDE OF THE NACA 0015 AIRFOIL WITH THE COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION. Media Mesin: Majalah Teknik Mesin 23, 70–82.

Julian, J., Iskandar, W., Wahyuni, F., Nely Toding Bunga, dan, 2023. Aerodynamic Performance Improvement on NACA 4415 Airfoil by Using Cavity 5, 135–142.

Julian, J., Karim, R.F., 2017. Flow control on a squareback model. International Review of Aerospace Engineering 10, 230–239.

Karim, R.F., Julian, J., 2018. Drag reduction due to recirculating bubble control using plasma actuator on a squareback model. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, p. 01108.

Kosasih, E.A., Karim, R.F., Julian, J., 2019. Drag reduction by combination of flow control using inlet disturbance body and plasma actuator on cylinder model. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 13, 4503–4511.

Kotsev, T., 2018. Viscous flow around spherical particles in different arrangements. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences.

Megawanto, F.C., Harinaldi, Budiarso, Julian, J., 2018. Numerical analysis of plasma actuator for drag reduction and lift enhancement on NACA 4415 airfoil. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, p. 050001.

Megawanto, F.C., Karim, R.F., Bunga, N.T., Julian, J., 2019. Flow separation delay on NACA 4415 airfoil using plasma actuator effect. International Review of Aerospace Engineering 12, 180–186.

Neto, C., Craig, V.S.J., Williams, D.R.M., 2003. Evidence of shear-dependent boundary slip in newtonian liquids. The European Physical Journal E 12, 71–74.

Tsuji, T., Narutomi, R., Yokomine, T., Ebara, S., Shimizu, A., 2003. Unsteady three-dimensional simulation of interactions between flow and two particles. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 29, 1431–1450.

Yang, Y., Zha, G., 2017. Super-Lift Coefficient of Active Flow Control Airfoil: What is the Limit? In: 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Zdravkovich, M.M., 1977. REVIEW—Review of Flow Interference Between Two Circular Cylinders in Various Arrangements. J Fluids Eng 99, 618–633.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/jurtek.15.2.315-324

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Powered by Puskom-UMJ