MULTI-FACETED INTERVENTIONS TO EMPOWER STREET VENDORS IN BENGALURU
Keywords:
Street vendors, empowerment, unorganised, informal sectorAbstract
The livelihoods of poor are determined by the setting in which they live and opportunities & constraints present in that setting. This is because the ecological, economic, social and political – conditions which largely determines the assets accessible to people, how they can use these (Sen, 1973a, 1998 & Meikle, 2002) and thus their ability to obtain secure livelihoods(Sen 1983d). Rural people see new opportunities in the urban areas in terms of employment, physical facilities and other opportunities; mostly because of not being able to generate decent living through incomes from agriculture or agricultural jobs. As a result, rural landless agricultural workers have little motivation to remain in agriculture. Instead, they choose to migrate to nearby towns or cities in search of more remunerative non- agricultural jobs. In the cities and towns that they migrate to, they end up in jobs that are more remunerative from their agricultural jobs but those that are at lowest spectrum of jobs in urban setting mostly in the informal sector. Street vending is a big part of the informal sector so much so that the term informal sector in Bogota was attributed exclusively to street vendors. Further, a large body of literature is found on the problems of street vendors in Bogota. In India too, a large part of the informal sector comprises street vending. An exploratory study conducted reveals that working life of both men and women street vendors outline the following characteristics of street vending; they work forexcessively long hours, under poor safety and security conditions at their workplaces, together with the illegal compensations/bribes they have to pay the local authorities, borrow at exorbitant rates of interest from money lenders etc. However, during the present study as part of the project on issues and concerns of street vendors found other problems plaguing street vendors. Among them was the problem of them being cheated by unscrupulous people who have been collecting money from the street vendors purportedly for an organisation‟s membership, which has come in to existence under the policy on street vending. Methedology:During a study on street vendors it was found that street vendors were being abused and cheated by some group of individuals in the pretext of getting them membership of organizations that help street vendors in various forms. In order to educate them and create awareness, social work students contacted a group of more than 50 vendors and a discussion was held with them to strategize an action plan. In association with Alternative Law Form – a NGO, interactions with street vendors were held. Sessions on their rights and awareness on available schemes generated confidence among the street vendors.A membership drive was conducted which resulted in more than 150 vendors applying for membership in the local municipality and other similar positive outcomes are also being observed. A questionnaire was designed and administered to assess Socio – Economic conditions of these vendors. Uddyam Foundation – a NGO, was on boarded for conducting sessions on Social and Financial management. Results of the intervention: Enhanced awareness about the rights and government schemes, More than 150 street vendors are about to get their Identity cards and legitimizing their vending, A platform created for brainstorming and solving issues similar to many, multi-dimensional approach to business. This has clearly indicated that, a social worker with support of right kind of organizations can play a significant role in creating awareness and educating street vendors.References
• A Report by ‘NATIONAL CONSULTATION ON CENTRAL LAW ON STREET VENDING’,
• Bhowmik, Sharit, K. 2001.Hawkers in the Urban Informal Sector: A Study of Street Vendors in SevenCities.Patna, India: NASVI.
• Bromley, Ray. 2000.”Street Vending and Public Policy: A Global Review.” International Journal of Sociologyand Social Policy, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 17.
• Chen, Martha Alter. 2004. Rethinking the Informal Economy: Linkages with the Formal Economy and theFormal Regulatory Environment.”EGDI-WIDER Conference, September 17-18, Helsinki, Finland.
• Chowdhury, Subhanil. 2011. “Employment in India: What Does the Latest Data Show?” Economic &Political Weekly, Vol. XLVI, No. 32 (August 6), pp. 23-26.
• Desai, R., D. Mahadevia and A. Mishra (2014). “City Profile: Guwahati,” Working Paper 24, “CUE WorkingPaper Series,” Centre for Urban Equity, CEPT University, Ahmedabad.
• Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS), August 2007.
• Ginneken, W.V. (2008). “Extending Social Security: Policies for Developing Countries”, International LabourReview,Vol.142, No. 3.
• GoI (2012). Report of the Committee on Unorganized Sector Statics, February 2012. National StatisticalCommission, GoI.
• GoI (2014). The Street vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014,Ministry of Law and Justice, GoI.
• ILO (1993). Resolution concerning statistics of employment in the informal sector, adopted by the FifteenthInternational Conference of Labour Statisticians (January 1993).
• ILO (1999) Decent Work, Report of the Director-General, International Labour Conference, 87th Session,ILO: Geneva.
• International Labour Office (1972). Employment, Incomes and Equality: A Strategy for Increasing ProductiveEmployment in Kenya, International Labour Office, Geneva.
• International Labour Office (2002). Decent Work and the Informal Economy, International Labour Office,Geneva.
• International Labour Office (2003). Report of the Seventeenth International Conference of LabourStatisticians, International Labour Office, Geneva.
• Krishnamurthy, J. and G. Raveendran. 2009. “Measures of Labour Force Participation and Utilization.”New Delhi: National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector.
• Mahadevia, Darshini; Mishra, Aseem and et. al , “Street Vending in Guwahati: Experiences of Conflict”Centre for Urban Equity (CUE), working paper 30 February 2016
• National Commission on Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (2009): The Challenge of Employment inIndia – An Informal Economy Perspective, Volume I – Main Report, NCEUS, New Delhi.
• National Policy on Urban Street Vendors (2004). Also Available at nceus.gov.in/Street%20Vendors%20policy.pdf
• JMSD, Special Issue 2018 / 718
• Report of the Committee on Unorganised Sector Statistics, National Statistics Commission, Governmentof India, New Delhi.
• “Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganized Sector”, NationalCommission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector, at http://www.wiego.org/resources/nationalconsultation-central-law-street-vending
• Rodgers, G. (2001). “Decent Work as a Development Objective”, Indian Journal of Development Economics,Vol. 44, No.1.
• Sundaram, S.S. (2008). “National Policy for Urban Street Vendors and Its Impact,” Economic and PoliticalWeekly, pp. 22-25.
• The Assam Tribune (2014). “Protecting the Street Vendors,” The Assam Tribune, December
• Vishal, Gaurav, International Indexed & Referred Research Journal, October,2012. ISSN 0974-2832, RNIRAJBIL2009/29954; VoL. IV * ISSUE- 45.