Reasons for freehold homeownership of the younger generations to live in vertical housing in the Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia

Pratami Fadillah, Joko Adianto

Abstract


This research aims to discover the reasons for the reasons for homeownership for the younger generations with vertical housing preferences in the Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Area (GJMA). Indonesia's population, which is dominated by the millennial and Z generations, has led to an increase in housing needs. The housing preferences of the younger generation based on their characteristics and lifestyle in megapolitan cities are suitable for vertical housing. Quantitative methods were used on 807 respondents in Indonesia with a five-point Likert scale and several open-ended questions about hobbies, reasons for owning a house, and perceived difficulties in owning a house. The results of descriptive statistical analysis and cross-tab analysis of the tabulated primary data-based coding show that the characteristics and lifestyles of the younger generation, as well as housing values, are more dominant. Identification of the factors associated with the characteristics that fall into the category of housing values was done through multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study inform the level of importance of homeownership among young people with vertical housing preferences in urban and suburban areas within marital status classifications. This study contributes to the improvement of future housing policies for Millennials and Gen Z.

Keywords


millennial, gen z, megacities, housing preference, vertical housing.

Full Text:

PDF

References


United Nations, ‘World Urbanization Prospect: The 2018 Revision’. 2019.

World Bank, ‘Population’. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://databank.worldbank.org

E. Baigent, ‘Patrick Geddes, Lewis Mumford and Jean Gottmann: Divisions over “megalopolis”’, Prog. Hum. Geogr., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 687–700, 2004, doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph514oa.

Kementerian PUPR, ‘Kurangi Backlog Hunian Layak, Kementerian PUPR Siapkan Grand Design Perumahan Segmen MBR Informal’. Accessed: Jun. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://pu.go.id/berita/kurangi-backlog-hunian-layak-kementerian-pupr-siapkan-grand-design-perumahan-segmen-mbr-informal

Y. Kuang and N. ka E Wu, ‘Urban Development and Sustainable Land Resource Management: An Ecological Geological Perspective’, Int. J. Energy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–3, 2023, doi: 10.54097/ije.v3i3.001.

S. Opit, K. Witten, and R. Kearns, ‘Housing pathways, aspirations and preferences of young adults within increasing urban density’, Hous. Stud., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 123–142, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02673037.2019.1584662.

K. S. H. King and K. H. Wong, ‘Vertical City: A Solution for Sustainable Living’, p. 584, 2015.

Badan Pusat Statistik, ‘Berita resmi statistik’, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2021/01/21/1854/hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html

F. C. K. Analisa and S. Okada, ‘Tiny house characteristics in Indonesia based on millennial’s user preference’, Urban, Plan. Transp. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/21650020.2023.2166095.

Kementerian PUPR & The World Bank, Penyediaan Rumah yang Aman, Layak & Terjangkau di Indonesia. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://nahp.pu.go.id/assets/files/storage/NAHP_Book_-_versi_Bahasa_Indonesia.pdf

D. Wang and S. M. Li, ‘Socio-economic differentials and stated housing preferences in Guangzhou, China’, Habitat Int., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 305–326, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.02.009.

H. S. Andersen, ‘Motives for tenure choice during the life cycle: The importance of non-economic factors and other housing preferences’, Housing, Theory Soc., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 183–207, 2011, doi: 10.1080/14036096.2010.522029.

A. Verhetsel, R. Kessels, T. Zijlstra, and M. Van Bavel, ‘Housing preferences among students: collective housing versus individual accommodations? A stated preference study in Antwerp (Belgium)’, J. Hous. Built Environ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 449–470, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10901-016-9522-5.

K. Hasanzadeh, M. Kyttä, and G. Brown, ‘Beyond Housing Preferences: Urban Structure and Actualisation of Residential Area Preferences’, Urban Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.3390/urbansci3010021.

S. Ismail, A. A. Manaf, M. Y. Hussain, N. Basrah, and F. U. M. Azian, ‘Housing preferences: An analysis of malaysian youths’, Plan. Malaysia, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 134–145, 2021, doi: 10.21837/PM.V19I17.993.

F. A. Pratama and H. Idajati, ‘Preferensi Hunian Generasi Z Berdasarkan Faktor Demografi yang Berpengaruh (Studi Kasus : Kota Surabaya)’, J. Tek. ITS, vol. 11, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v11i2.85048.

M. T. O. Wong, ‘Intergenerational family support for “Generation Rent”: the family home for socially disengaged young people’, Hous. Stud., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2019, doi: 10.1080/02673037.2017.1364713.

J. Adianto, R. T. Gabe, and M. A. Farraz, ‘The influence of family relations on the housing preferences of Millennials in Depok, Indonesia’, J. Urban., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 84–100, 2023, doi: 10.1080/17549175.2021.1944282.

J. M. Najman et al., ‘Does the millennial generation of women experience more mental illness than their mothers?’, BMC Psychiatry, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03361-5.

C. K. Y. Chan and K. K. W. Lee, ‘The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?’, Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3.

E. S. W. Ng, L. Schweitzer, and S. T. Lyons, ‘New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation’, J. Bus. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 281–292, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4.

L. A. Aryan et al., ‘How digital financial literacy impacts financial behavior in Jordanian millennial generation’, Int. J. Data Netw. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 117–124, 2024, doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.10.011.

D. Avom and F. Yselle Malah, ‘Social media and happiness nexus in the millennial generation’, Telecomm. Policy, vol. 46, no. 8, p. 102368, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102368.

M. Escalonilla, B. Cueto, and M. J. Pérez-Villadóniga, Is the Millennial Generation Left Behind? Inter-Cohort Labour Income Inequality in a Context of Economic Shock, vol. 164, no. 1. Springer Netherlands, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11205-022-02958-x.

E. S. Ng, A. Posch, T. Köllen, N. Kraiczy, and N. Thom, ‘Do “one-size” employment policies fit all young workers? Heterogeneity in work attribute preferences among the Millennial generation’, BRQ Bus. Res. Q., 2022, doi: 10.1177/23409444221085587.

M. Ibrahim, B. Karollah, V. Juned, and M. Yunus, ‘The Effect of Transformational Leadership, Work Motivation and Culture on Millennial Generation Employees Performance of the Manufacturing Industry in the Digital Era’, Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. May, pp. 1–5, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908966.

M. Mac an Ghaill and C. Haywood, ‘State containment and closure of gendered possibilities among a millennial generation: On not knowing Muslim young men’, Sociol. Rev., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 419–437, 2022, doi: 10.1177/00380261221076192.

E. Pomarici and R. Vecchio, ‘Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: An exploratory study on Italian consumers’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 66, pp. 537–545, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.058.

S. D. Purwatiningsih, S. Ekowati, and M. I. Saputra, ‘The Use of Adblocker on The Quality of Attention of The Jakarta Millennial Generations in Information Search through Online Media’, Qual. - Access to Success, vol. 23, no. 191, pp. 335–347, 2022, doi: 10.47750/QAS/23.191.38.

B. C. K. Putriastuti and A. Stasi, ‘How To Lead the Millennials: a Review of 5 Major Leadership Theory Groups’, J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 96–111, 2019, doi: 10.22146/jlo.46562.

E. Rombe, Z. Zahara, I. N. Santi, and M. D. Rahadhini, ‘Exploring E-mobile banking implementation barriers on indonesian millennial generation consumers’, Int. J. Data Netw. Sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 579–586, 2021, doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.8.010.

G. Sogari, ‘Millennial Generation and Environmental Sustainability : The Role of Social Media in the Consumer Purchasing Behavior for Wine’, 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9101911.

O. M. Solaja and A. A. Ogunola, ‘Leadership Style and Multigenerational Workforce: A Call for Workplace Agility in Nigerian Public Organizations’, Int. J. African Asian Stud. www.iiste.org ISSN 2409-6938, vol. 21, no. January 2016, pp. 46–56, 2016, [Online]. Available: www.iiste.org

C. Wiradendi Wolor, A. Pratama, S. Aditya, N. Fadillah F, and D. Purwana, ‘Adversity Quotient in Improving Millennial Generation Salespeople’S Performance in the Industrial Revolution 4.0’, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 220–226, 2020, doi: 10.18510/hssr.2020.8131.

H. J. Anderson, J. E. Baur, J. A. Griffith, and M. R. Buckley, ‘What works for you may not work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation’, Leadersh. Q., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 245–260, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001.

Asyari, M. E. Hoque, M. K. Hassan, P. Susanto, T. Jannat, and A. Al Mamun, ‘Millennial Generation’s Islamic Banking Behavioral Intention: The Moderating Role of Profit-Loss Sharing, Perceived Financial Risk, Knowledge of Riba, and Marketing Relationship’, J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 15, no. 12, 2022, doi: 10.3390/jrfm15120590.

T. Bahfiarti and A. Arianto, ‘Uses and gratifications approach: influence of COVID-19 media exposure on millennial generation in Makassar city, Indonesia’, Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09704.

S. Bano and C. M. O’Shea, ‘Emotional intelligence and stock trading decisions: Indonesia’s millennial generation in the COVID-19 era’, Asian Econ. Financ. Rev., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 949–969, 2023, doi: 10.55493/5002.V13I12.4893.

C. Easton and R. Steyn, ‘Leadership styles and effectiveness in the workplace: A perspective of the millennial generation’, South African J. Econ. Manag. Sci., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.4102/sajems.v25i1.4541.

M. R. Hill, S. Goicochea, L. J. Merlo, M. R. Hill, S. Goicochea, and L. J. Merlo, ‘In their own words : stressors facing medical students in the millennial generation generation’, Med. Educ. Online, vol. 23, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1530558.

N. Asandimitra, A. Kautsar, T. M. Kusumaningrum, and I. D. C. Arifah, ‘Undermining Shoestring Budget: Financial Capability Determinants of Millennial Generation’, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1137–1147, 2023, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.180417.

K. I. Rock and D. C. MacMillan, ‘Can Substitutes Reduce Future Demand for Wildlife Products: A Case Study of China’s Millennial Generation’, Hum. Ecol., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 91–111, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10745-021-00279-0.

J. Walden, E. H. Jung, and C. Y. K. Westerman, ‘Employee communication, job engagement, and organizational commitment: A study of members of the Millennial Generation’, J. Public Relations Res., vol. 29, no. 2–3, pp. 73–89, 2017, doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2017.1329737.

G. Boutaky, S. Boutaky, K. Mialed, and A. Sahib-Eddine, ‘The Relationship Between the Development of Entrepreneurial Activities in the Age of Technology and the Characters of Digitally Oriented Generations Z & Y: What Is the New Challenge for Business Schools?’, J. High. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 215–224, 2023, doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v23i15.6436.

C. Seemiller and M. Grace, Generation Z: A Century in the Making. Routledge, 2019.

J. Eckleberry-Hunt, D. Lick, and R. Hunt, ‘Is Medical Education Ready for Generation Z?’, J. Grad. Med. Educ., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 378–381, 2018, doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00466.1.

D. A. J. Bornman, ‘Gender-based leadership perceptions and preferences of Generation Z as future business leaders in South Africa’, Acta Commer., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.4102/ac.v19i1.708.

A. A. Fisu, I. Syabri, and I. G. A. Andani, ‘How do young people move around in urban spaces?: Exploring trip patterns of generation-Z in urban areas by examining travel histories on Google Maps Timeline’, Travel Behav. Soc., vol. 34, no. September 2023, p. 100686, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100686.

M. Graczyk-Kucharska and G. S. Erickson, ‘A person-organization fit model of Generation Z: Preliminary studies’, J. Entrep. Manag. Innov., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 149–176, 2020, doi: 10.7341/20201645.

V. Kuleto et al., ‘Extended reality in higher education, a responsible innovation approach for generation y and generation z’, Sustain., vol. 13, no. 21, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132111814.

C. Dobre, A. M. Milovan, C. Duțu, G. Preda, and A. Agapie, ‘The common values of social media marketing and luxury brands. The millennials and generation z perspective’, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2532–2553, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jtaer16070139.

D. Egerová, L. Komárková, and J. Kutlák, ‘Generation Y and generation Z employment expectations: A generational cohort comparative study from two countries’, E a M Ekon. a Manag., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 93–109, 2021, doi: 10.15240/TUL/001/2021-03-006.

V. Pavluković, A. B. Carmer, M. D. Vujičić, M. Cimbaljević, and U. Stankov, ‘Unveiling the Motivational Factors behind Generation Z’s Conference Attendance for Sustaining Future Participation’, Sustain., vol. 15, no. 18, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151813989.

M. O. Tănase, P. Nistoreanu, R. Dina, B. Georgescu, V. Nicula, and C. N. Mirea, ‘Generation Z Romanian Students’ Relation with Rural Tourism—An Exploratory Study’, Sustain., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15108166.

R. Stojsavljević et al., ‘In Search for Meaning? Modelling Generation Z Spiritual Travel Motivation Scale—The Case of Serbia’, Sustain., vol. 15, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15065292.

S. E. Polzin, X. Chu, and J. Godfrey, ‘The impact of millennials’ travel behavior on future personal vehicle travel’, Energy Strateg. Rev., vol. 5, pp. 59–65, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.003.

W. A. V. Clark, ‘Millennials in the Housing Market: The Transition to Ownership in Challenging Contexts’, Housing, Theory Soc., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 206–227, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14036096.2018.1510852.

T. P. Mountain, X. Cao, N. Kim, and M. S. Gutter, ‘Millennials’ Future Homeownership and the Role of Student Loan Debt’, Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 5–23, 2020, doi: 10.1111/fcsr.12374.

S. Zulaikha, M. Nasrudin, and E. P. Lestari, ‘Dialectic of Public Sphere vs Private Sphere in Millennial Families in Lampung Customary Law Community’, Samarah, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 928–956, 2021, doi: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.9150.

R. Evans and K. A. Karl, ‘Is helicopter parenting stifling moral courage and promoting moral disengagement? Implications for the training and development of millennial managers’, Manag. Res. Rev., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 700–714, 2022, doi: 10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0044.

P. Mariati, S. Djazilan, Nafiah, and S. Hartatik, ‘Before The Pandemic and its Impact to the Future about IoT and the Transformation of Children’s Social Education’, Pegem Egit. ve Ogr. Derg., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2022, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.12.02.09.

F. Fadilla, G. Yudhana, and E. F. Rini, ‘Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Preferensi Bermukim Penghuni Perumahan Formal Kota Surakarta Studi Kasus Kelurahan Mojosongo’, Arsitektura, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 50, 2017, doi: 10.20961/arst.v15i1.11390.

A. Syafrina, A. C. Tampubolon, Suhendri, N. Hasriyanti, and H. E. Kusuma, ‘Preferensi Masyarakat tentang Lingkungan Perumahan yang Ingin Ditinggali’, Rev. Urban. Archit. Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 32–45, 2018, doi: 10.21776/ub.ruas.2018.016.01.3.

D. Pfeiffer, G. Pearthree, and M. M. Ehlenz, ‘Inventing what Millennials want downtown: housing the urban generation in low-density metropolitan regions’, J. Urban., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 433–455, 2019, doi: 10.1080/17549175.2019.1626267.

D. A. Conrad and L. T. N. Brown, ‘The Impact of Macroeconomic Fluctuations on the Likelihood of African American Female Homeownership’, Rev. Black Polit. Econ., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 299–309, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12114-011-9113-3.

T. M. Kauppinen, H. Skifter Andersen, and L. Hedman, ‘Determinants of immigrants’ entry to homeownership in three nordic capital city regions’, Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr., vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 343–362, 2015, doi: 10.1111/geob.12085.

V. Krishnan and K. J. Krotki, ‘Life Cycle Effects on Homeownership in Canada’, Hous. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 120–127, 1993, doi: 10.1080/02673039308720755.

Q. Ying, D. Luo, and J. Chen, ‘The Determinants of Homeownership Affordability among the “Sandwich Class”: Empirical Findings from Guangzhou, China’, Urban Stud., vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1870–1888, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0042098012470398.

K. J. Chen, C. W. Peng, and M. H. Lee, ‘Determinants of the public’s attitude towards social housing construction under high home ownership rate’, Int. Real Estate Rev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 87–112, 2021.

J. H. Oh, ‘Race/ethnicity, homeownership, and neighborhood attachment’, Race Soc., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 63–77, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2005.05.002.

T. H. Tan and J. H. Lee, ‘Assessing the determinants of retirement home ownership among Malaysian young-old seniors’, Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 687–700, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJHMA-08-2017-0072.

X. Gan, J. Zuo, E. Baker, R. Chang, and T. Wen, ‘Exploring the determinants of residential satisfaction in public rental housing in China: a case study of Chongqing’, J. Hous. Built Environ., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 869–895, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10901-019-09691-x.

M. Bangura and C. L. Lee, ‘The determinants of homeownership affordability in Greater Sydney: evidence from a submarket analysis’, Hous. Stud., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 206–232, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02673037.2021.1879995.

M. C. Colom Andrés and M. C. Molés Machí, ‘Homeownership and Living Conditions of the Immigrant Population in Spain: Differences and Similarities among Immigrant Groups’, Housing, Theory Soc., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 477–504, 2017, doi: 10.1080/14036096.2016.1268201.

J. Lauridsen, N. Nannerup, and M. Skak, ‘Geographic and dynamic heterogeneity of home ownership’, J. Hous. Built Environ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10901-008-9127-8.

C. Ren, ‘Consumption and Economic Security: A Two-Stage Conceptualization of Sustainable Homeownership in the United States’, Urban Aff. Rev., 2024, doi: 10.1177/10780874231223113.

J. Dodson and N. Sipe, ‘Shocking the suburbs: Urban location, homeownership and oil vulnerability in the Australian City’, Hous. Stud., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 377–401, 2008, doi: 10.1080/02673030802015619.

M. D. Webb and L. A. Brown, ‘Foreclosure, Inequality, and the Difference That Place Makes’, Rural Sociol., vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 688–712, 2017, doi: 10.1111/ruso.12152.

S. Kayapinar Kaya, Y. Ozdemir, and M. Dal, ‘“Home-buying behaviour model of Generation Y in Turkey”’, Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 713–736, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJHMA-05-2019-0048.

K. J. Kam, A. S. H. Lim, K. M. Al-Obaidi, and T. S. Lim, ‘Evaluating Housing Needs and Preferences of Generation Y in Malaysia’, Plan. Pract. Res., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 172–185, 2018, doi: 10.1080/02697459.2018.1427413.

J. L. Adelson and D. B. McCoach, ‘Measuring the mathematical attitudes of elementary students: The effects of a 4-point or 5-point likert-type scale’, Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 796–807, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0013164410366694.

H. M. Davey, A. L. Barratt, P. N. Butow, and J. J. Deeks, ‘A one-item question with a Likert or Visual Analog Scale adequately measured current anxiety’, J. Clin. Epidemiol., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 356–360, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.015.

L. W. Ferguson, ‘A Study of the Likert Technique of Attitude Scale Construction’, J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 1941, doi: 10.1080/00224545.1941.9714060.

S. Grant et al., ‘A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise’, Chest, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 1208–1217, 1999, doi: 10.1378/chest.116.5.1208.

G. W. K. Ho, ‘Examining Perceptions and Attitudes: A Review of Likert-Type Scales Versus Q-Methodology’, West. J. Nurs. Res., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 674–689, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0193945916661302.

R. Likert, S. Roslow, and G. Murphy, ‘A Simple and Reliable Method of Scoring the Thurstone Attitude Scales’, J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 228–238, 1934, doi: 10.1080/00224545.1934.9919450.

J. R. Masters, ‘T H E R E L A T I O N S H I P B E T W E E N N U M B E R OF R E S P O N S E C A T E G O R I E S A N D R E L I A B I L I T Y OF L I K E R T - T Y P E QUESTIONNAIRES l’, vol. I, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 1974.

E. Muraki, ‘Fitting a Polytomous Item Response Model to Likert-Type Data’, Appl. Psychol. Meas., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 1990, doi: 10.1177/014662169001400106.

U. Böckenholt, ‘Supplemental Material for Measuring Response Styles in Likert Items’, Psychol. Methods, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 69–83, 2017, doi: 10.1037/met0000106.supp.

F. Morales-Vives, U. Lorenzo-Seva, and A. Vigil-Colet, ‘Cómo afectan los sesgos de respuesta a la estructura factorial de los tests basados en el modelo de los cinco grandes factores de personalidad’, An. Psicol., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 589–596, 2017, doi: 10.6018/analesps.33.2.254841.

G. Zou, L. Zou, and S. fang Qiu, ‘Parametric and nonparametric methods for confidence intervals and sample size planning for win probability in parallel-group randomized trials with Likert item and Likert scale data’, Pharm. Stat., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 418–439, 2023, doi: 10.1002/pst.2280.

R. Likert, ‘A method for measuring the sales influence of a radio program’, J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 1936, doi: 10.1037/h0053694.

C. C. Reed, W. A. Wolf, C. C. Cotton, and E. S. Dellon, ‘A visual analogue scale and a Likert scale are simple and responsive tools for assessing dysphagia in eosinophilic oesophagitis’, Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1443–1448, 2017, doi: 10.1111/apt.14061.

A. B. Rosenkrantz et al., ‘Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales’, Radiology, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 482–492, 2013, doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122233.

A. B. Rosenkrantz, R. P. Lim, M. Haghighi, M. B. Somberg, J. S. Babb, and S. S. Taneja, ‘Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI’, Am. J. Roentgenol., vol. 201, no. 4, pp. 612–618, 2013, doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10173.

P. Vonglao, ‘Application of fuzzy logic to improve the Likert scale to measure latent variables’, Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 337–344, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2017.01.002.

A. Voutilainen, T. Pitkäaho, T. Kvist, and K. Vehviläinen-Julkunen, ‘How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale’, J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 946–957, 2016, doi: 10.1111/jan.12875.

L. D. Allison, M. A. Okun, and K. S. Dutridge, ‘Assessing Volunteer Motives: A Comparison of an Open-ended Probe and Likert Rating Scales’, J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 243–255, 2002, doi: 10.1002/casp.677.

J. H. Chan, K. Iankova, Y. Zhang, T. McDonald, and X. Qi, ‘The role of self-gentrification in sustainable tourism: Indigenous entrepreneurship at Honghe Hani Rice Terraces World Heritage Site, China’, J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 24, no. 8–9, pp. 1262–1279, 2016, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1189923.

G. Improta, A. Perrone, M. A. Russo, and M. Triassi, ‘Health technology assessment (HTA) of optoelectronic biosensors for oncology by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Likert scale’, BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0775-z.

S. J. T. Jansen, H. C. C. H. Coolen, and R. W.Goetgeluk, Eds., The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice. Springer Netherlands, 2011.

M. L. Mitchell and J. M. Jolley, Explained SEVENTH EDITION. 2013.

W. Zhang and D. Velez, ‘Effects of COVID-19 on Physical Activity and Its Relationship With Mental Health in a US Community Sample: Cross-sectional, Convenience Sampling-based Online Survey’, JMIR Form. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.2196/32387.

J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: choosing among five approaches, vol. 2. 2007.

B. Fletcher, L. Hinton, R. McManus, and O. Rivero-Arias, ‘Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: A discrete choice experiment’, Br. J. Gen. Pract., vol. 69, no. 686, pp. E629–E637, 2019, doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705101.

F. Mabrouk, M. M. Mekni, and A. Aldawish, ‘Digital Learning, Life Satisfaction, and Perceived Stress Due to COVID-19 Emergency: Case Study Among Female Saudi University Students’, Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. May, pp. 1–8, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875608.

P. Nemlekar, M. Shepherd, K. Lawson, and S. Rush, ‘Web-based survey to assess the perceptions of managed care organization representatives on use of copay subsidy coupons for prescription drugs’, J. Manag. Care Pharm., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 602–608, 2013, doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.8.602.

A. D. Okely et al., ‘A collaborative approach to adopting/adapting guidelines - The Australian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the early years (Birth to 5 years): An integration of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep’, BMC Public Health, vol. 17, no. Suppl 5, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4867-6.

A. O. E. van den Bulck et al., ‘Which client characteristics predict home-care needs? Results of a survey study among Dutch home-care nurses’, Heal. Soc. Care Community, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 93–104, 2019, doi: 10.1111/hsc.12611.

F. M. Vermeulen et al., ‘The European TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce survey: prescribing practices in Europe for phototherapy and systemic therapy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema*’, Br. J. Dermatol., vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 1073–1082, 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjd.18959.

X. Wu, M. J. Knuth, C. R. Hall, and M. A. Palma, ‘Increasing profit margins by substituting species in floral arrangements’, Horttechnology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2021, doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH04695-20.

E. Valovirta and G. Scadding, ‘Parental attitudes toward new dosage forms of desloratadine in an online survey: Results from four European countries’, Curr. Med. Res. Opin., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 2061–2067, 2009, doi: 10.1185/03007990903116834.

V. Ranieri et al., ‘COVID-19 welbeing study: A protocol examining perceived coercion and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic by means of an online survey, asynchronous virtual focus groups and individual interviews’, BMJ Open, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043418.

M. A. Farraz and L. S. Barus, ‘Housing Preferences and Choice Young Families Commuters in Depok City, Indonesia’, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/264/1/012010.

A. Frenkel and S. Kaplan, ‘The joint choice of tenure, dwelling type, size and location: the effect of home-oriented versus culture-oriented lifestyle’, Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 233–251, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s12076-014-0131-1.

F. Wu, ‘Housing environment preference of young consumers in Guangzhou, China: Using the analytic hierarchy process’, Prop. Manag., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 174–192, 2010, doi: 10.1108/02637471011051318.

W. A. V. Clark and Y. Huang, ‘The life course and residential mobility in British housing markets’, Environ. Plan. A, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 323–339, 2003, doi: 10.1068/a3542.

Z. Duan, H. Zhao, and Z. Li, ‘Non-linear effects of built environment and socio-demographics on activity space’, J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 111, no. July, p. 103671, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103671.

M. yung Leung, I. O. Famakin, and K. Ahmed, ‘Comparison of facilities management in private domestic buildings among different elderly groups in Hong Kong’, Facilities, vol. 36, no. 7–8, pp. 386–402, 2018, doi: 10.1108/F-01-2017-0009.

D. Macpherson and J. B. Stewart, ‘David Macpherson and James B. Stewart’, 1980.

A. L. Sweaney, J. F. Pittman, and J. E. Montgomery, ‘The influence of marital status and age on the housing behavior of older southern women’, J. Hous. Elderly, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 25–36, 1985, doi: 10.1300/J081V02N03_04.

K. M. Gibler, J. Kananen, and T. Tyvimaa, ‘The relationship between the determinants of rental housing satisfaction and considering moving in Finland’, Prop. Manag., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 104–124, 2014, doi: 10.1108/PM-02-2013-0009.

Z. Nasreen and K. J. Ruming, ‘Shared Room Housing and Home: Unpacking the Home-making Practices of Shared Room Tenants in Sydney, Australia’, Housing, Theory Soc., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 152–172, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1717597.

A. Mabin and S. Parnell, ‘Recommodification and working-class home ownership: New directions for South African cities?’, South African Geogr. J., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 148–166, 1983, doi: 10.1080/03736245.1983.10559681.

D. Lassarre, ‘Moving into home ownership’, J. Econ. Psychol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 161–178, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0167-4870(86)90002-4.

M. Guàrdia, J. L. Oyón, M. Rosselló, and D. H. Falagán, ‘Working-class suburban housing, homeownership and urban social movements during Francoism in Barcelona, 1939–1975’, Plan. Perspect., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 671–693, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02665433.2022.2108488.

M. J. Botsch and S. D. Morris, ‘Job loss risk, expected mobility, and home ownership’, J. Hous. Econ., vol. 53, no. November 2020, p. 101733, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2020.101733.

J. E. Long and S. B. Caudill, ‘RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN HOMEOWNERSHIP and HOUSING WEALTH, 1970–1986’, Econ. Inq., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 83–100, 1992, doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1992.tb01537.x.

E. N. Wolff, ‘African-American and Hispanic Income, Wealth and Homeownership since 1989’, Rev. Income Wealth, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 189–233, 2022, doi: 10.1111/roiw.12518.

L. Xiao, Q. Qiu, and L. Gao, ‘Chinese housing reform and social sustainability: Evidence from post-reform home ownership’, Sustain., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1–14, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8101053.

Y. Zhan, ‘“My life is elsewhere”: social exclusion and rural migrants’ consumption of homeownership in contemporary China’, Dialect. Anthropol., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 405–422, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10624-015-9401-6.

L. Liao, W. Wu, and C. Zhang, ‘Housing prices and the subjective well-being of migrant workers: evidence from China’, J. Happiness Stud., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 3363–3388, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00549-8.

L. Li and X. Wu, ‘The Consequences of Having a Son on Family Wealth in Urban China’, Rev. Income Wealth, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 378–393, 2017, doi: 10.1111/roiw.12215.

I. García and K. Kim, ‘“I Felt Safe”: The Role of the Rapid Rehousing Program in Supporting the Security of Families Experiencing Homelessness in Salt Lake County, Utah’, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134840.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/ijbesr.8.1.45-62

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research



Indexed on:

 Garba Rujukan Digital(Garuda)

Powered by Puskom-UMJ