EVALUATION FOR USER’S SATISFACTION ON PATHWAY AND STREET FURNITURE FACILITIES IN THAMRIN-SUDIRMAN AREA
Abstract
The Global Climate Change Problem is a global problem throughout the world. This requires the attention of all countries to commit to reducing carbon foot print by reducing the use of private vehicles. One way of their lives. So the development of cities when they need to be designed using carbon fooprint. Design cities to encourage people to use public transportation and motivate people to walk. The Thamrin and Sudirman Areas are trade and service centers, and primary activity centers, as well as a strategic area (Integrated Commerce Center and Upper Hamlet area are exchanges of mass public transport (TOD)) (Spatial Planning for DKI Jakarta Province in 2010-2030 ). As a provincial strategic area, for the past 5 years the DKI Provincial government has built pedestrian and public transportation facilities to improve the convenience of pedestrian and public transportation users.
This study discusses road user satisfaction with pedestrian facility requirements: lanes, road furniture, and nameplates in the Thamrin Sudirman area. This study discusses user satisfaction in pedestrian facilities in the Thamrin Sudirman area. Locations in Thamrin Sudirman: Sarinah, Bunderan Hotel Indonesia, Dukuh Atas, Setia Budi-Chase Plaza, Hilir-Atmajaya Dam, Bung Karno Gelora, Sudirman-MRT Senayan-Ratu Plaza, and ASEAN MRT area. Survey assessment tools based on satisfaction levels of 1-9 scale, with criteria for elements: (1) path (Property, design, quality, hallway, shade, lighting, user friendliness, landscaping, maintenance, environment), (2) Street furniture and signage (Furniture and road shades, lamp post placement, information boards, signage).
The results showed the Sudirman-MRT Senayan-Ratu Plaza area and the Gelora Bung Karno area, as a road that was considered to have a high level of satisfaction for pedestrians. Pathway design, street furniture and signage can fulfill pedestrian satisfaction. Thus it is expected that the design of pedestrian paths in these locations can be a reference for the design of pedestrian facilities.
Keywords: satisfaction, users, pathways, street furniture
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
. Asadi-Shekari Z, Moeinaddini M, and Zaly Shah M, Journal of Transportation Engineering. 139 181-92 ; 2013
. Badan Pusat Statistik, (Statistic Data Centre), Jakarta Transportation Data of Vehicle ; 2018, https://bps.go.id/site/resultTab.
. Daamen, W., and Hoogendoorn, S. P, Free Speed Distributions—Based On Empirical Data In Different Traffic Conditions. Pedestrian And Evacuation Dynamics, N. Waldau, ed., Springer, Berlin, 13–25 ; 2005.
. Fruin J J, Pedestrian planning and design (New York: Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners) ; 1971.
. Governor Regulation, Governor Regulation Number 155 Year 2018 concerning Traffic Restrictions with the Even-Odd System; 2018. (Peraturan Gubernur, (2018), Peraturan Gubernur Nomor 155 Tahun 2018 tentang Pembatasan Lalu Lintas dengan Sistem Ganjil-Genap.)
. Governor Regulation, Spatial Planning for DKI Jakarta Province in 2010-2030 ; 2009.
. Jiang Pan, Research on Green Transportation and Transfer System in Urban Areas, Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Automobile and Traffic Science, Materials, Metallurgy Engineering (MMAT 2012) ; 2012.
. Lam, W. H. K., and Cheung, C, Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for walking facilities in Hong Kong. J. Transp. Eng., 126(4), 343–349; 2000.
. Landis B W et al, Modeling the roadside walking environment: A Pedestrian Level of Service (Transportation Research Board) ; 2001
. Litman T A, Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1828 3-11; 2003.
. Litvin S W Tourism Management. 26 421-29 ; 2005.
. McManus P M, The Journal of Tourism Studies. 19 40-50; 1998.
. Papadimitriou E A, Europe Safety Science. 53 114-122 ; 2013. Practice 41 98-106 ; 2007
. Pucher J, Buehler R, and Seinen M, Transportation Research Part A. 45 451-75; 2011.
. R Rajat, T Ilango, and C Satish, Design Implications of Walking Speed for Pedestrian, Facilities, Journal of Transportation Engineering ; 2011
. R Zainol, F Ahmad, N A Nordin, A W M Aripin, Evaluation of users' satisfaction on pedestrian facilities using pair-wise comparison approach. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 18 (2014) 012175 ; 2014.
. Saaty T L, Int J Services Sciences 1 83-98 ; 2008.
. Southworth, Michael, Reclaiming The Walkable City, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Fall 2005 ; 2005.
. Stradling S G Anable J and Carreno M, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and
. Vuchic, R Vucha, Urban Public Transportation Systems, Transportation Engineering And Planning – Vol. I – no 2 Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) United Nation Educational Scientific and cultural organization; 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/ijbesr.4.1.61-72
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research
Indexed on: