PERANG DAN KEAMANAN DALAM TINJAUAN TEORI NEOREALISME DAN INSTITUSIONALISME
Abstract
The theory of neorealism stated that the strong and powerful will dominate and monopolize the world, whereas the insignificant will become marginalized. This concept was focused on gaining benefits rather than having a profound cooperation between countries. However, the said theory which also believed in pro-war (propaganda) has been argued by institutionalism theory. The institutionalism theory proposed that the outbreak of war may be caused by a failure in political institutions. Therefore, safety issues were more than military affairs but national security and economic relations between countries. The conspicuous objectives between those theories were that the institutionalists believed in sustainable cooperation of both parties to achieve an absolute benefit, whereas the neorealists relied on gaining advantages in cooperation. The article uses the library research and implements a qualitative-critical descriptive on the research method. Discourse analysis is carried out to prevent an overlapping data in the data analysis. In conclusion, theory of neorealism implements a domination by monopolizing power to elude a cooperation to occurred. Meanwhile, the institutionalism theory would prioritize on finding a win-win solution to resolve conflict in order to evade war.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alagappa, M. (1995). Regionalism and Conflict Management: A Framework for Analysis. Review of International Studies 21(4), 359-387.
Alagappa, M. (pnyt.). (1998). Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Alfian. (1986). Latar Belakang Terbentuknya ASEAN. Jakarta: Seknas ASEAN Departemen Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia.
Anthony, M. C. (2002). Partnership for Peace in Asia: ASEAN, The ARF, and The United Nations. Contemporary Southeast Asia 24(3), 528-548.
Baldwin, D. (pnyt.). (1993). Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Betts, R. (1994). Wealth, Power and Instability: East Asia and The United States After The Cold War. International Security 18(3), 34-77.
Bungin, B. (pnyt.). (2012). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif: Pemahaman Filosofis Dan Metodologis Ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Buzan, B & Segal, G. (1998). Rethinking East Asia Security. Dlm. Klare, M.T & Chandrani, Y. (Pnyt.). World Security, hlm. 117-132. Ed. Ke-3. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Buzan, B., Waever., O & de Wilde. J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Creswell, J. (2008). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.
Creswell. J. W. (1994). Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: SAGE Publications.
Eckstein, A. (2003). Thucydides, The Outbreak of The Peloponnesian War, and The Foundation of International Systems Theory. Bulletin of The Institute of Historical Research, (24), 757-774.
Elga, Y. (2014). Kisah-Kisah Pembantaian Kejam dalam Peperangan Dunia. Yogyakarta: Palapa.
Gaddis, J. L. (1986). The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in The Postwar International System. International Security (10), 99-142.
Gaddis, J. L. (1990). Russia, The Soviet Union and The United States: An Interpretative History. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hanson, V. D. (2005). A War Like No Other: How The Athenians and The Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War. New York: Random House.
Irewati, A. (2014). Meninjau Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbatasan di ASEAN. Jakarta: LIPI.
Kamarulzaman, A., Bercovitch, J., & Oishi, M. (2002). The ASEAN Way of Conflict Management: Old Patterns and New Trends. Asian Journal of Political Science, 10(2), 21-42.
Kaplan, L. S. (1984). The United States and NATO: The Formative Years. Lexington, Ky: University Press of Kentucky.
Koehane, R & Nye, J. (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Koehane, R. (pnyt.). (1986). Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Koehane, R. (1989). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Ed. Ke- 2. Boston: Little Brown.
Lipson, C. (1993). International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs. Dlm. Baldwin, D. (Pnyt.). Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, hlm. 132-151. New York: Columbia University Press.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1978). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Ed. Ke-5. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Nye, J. Jr. (2003). Understanding International Conflicts. Ed. Ke-4. New York: Longman.
Othman, Z. (2006). Demokrasi, Kepimpinan dan Keselamatan Dalam Politik Malaysia. Dlm. Mayudin, G., Hamil, J., Daud, S., & Zaini Othman. (Pnyt.). Neorealisme dan Institusionalisme dalam Perang dan Keamanan, hlm. 187-203. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Parameswaran, P. (2014). Explaining US Strategic Partnerships in The Asia-Pacific Region: Origins, Developments and Prospects. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 36(2), 262-289.
Pasaribu, S. (2019). Buku Sejarah Perang Dunia: History of The World War. Jakarta: Alexander Books.
Seknas ASEAN. (1986). ASEAN Selayang Pandang. Jakarta: Departemen Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia.
Suryohadiprojo, S. (2005). Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum: Membangun Pertahanan Negara Yang Modern Dan Efektif. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Viotti, P & Kauppi, M. (1999). Realism, Pluralism, Globalism and Beyond. Ed. Ke-3. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Walt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, K. (1954). Man, The State and War. New York: Columbia Universty Press.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw Hills.
Williams, P., Donald M.G., & Jay M. Shafritz. (Pnyt.). (1994). Classics Readings of International Relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/independen.3.1.25-36
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal INDEPENDEN: Jurnal Politik Indonesia dan Global Indexed by:
Jurnal INDEPENDEN: Jurnal Politik Indonesia dan Global (e-ISSN:2721-9755).
.png){kind=logo}
