Design of Automotive Product Seat Lifting Aids in Minimizing MSD Complaints using AHOQ Method (Case Study: Final Line of Automotive Industry Assembly Process)
Abstract
Along with the times, every human level and life will be upgraded automatically. Likewise, the company if it does not adjust to the times, it will be difficult to adjust. As with the production process, there will be differences from time to time. From time immemorial, doing work manually, and in the present era using technological tools. Lifting the car seat manually makes the operator complain of pain, due to the high production volume. To eliminate the complaints from these operators, a proposed tool design was made. The method used is Axiomatic House of Quality. In general, Axiomatic Design can help the product development process be more structured with a focus on design that fits the function of the product. The first step in this research is to collect input from customers. Then after getting input from the customer, it is converted into a customer attribute. Then, develop the concept by making several alternatives based on the combination table. Next, determine the design that will be used and carry out testing and coordinate with the user, namely the assembly operator. Finally, determine the specifications and final design of the tool for lifting a seat whose load exceeds the lifting standard. The results of this study are in the form of a design tool for lifting the seat which is expected to reduce complaints of pain to the operator. So that this design design makes the company a consideration for implementation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hamizatun, Zuki, N. M., & Azizul, Q. (2019). Risks assessment at automotive manufacturing company and ergonomic working condition. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 469(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/469/1/012106.
Amrina, E., Andalas, U., & Yusof, S. (2011). Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, (December), 1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2011.6118084.
Nelfiyanti, Mohamed, N., & Azhar, N. A. J. (2021). Identification of Ergonomic Issues Among Malaysian Automotive Assembly Workers by Using the Nordic Body Map Method. In Recent Trends in Manufacturing and Materials Towards Industry 4.0: Selected Articles from IM3F 2020, Malaysia, 69–81. Springer, Singapore.
Mishra, S., Kannan, S., Manager, C., Statistics, A., Comments, R., & Alert, E. (2018). Comparing the Effectiveness of Three Ergonomic Risk Assessment Methods—RULA, LUBA, and NERPA—to Predict the Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 22(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM.
Nelfiyanti, & Zuki, N. (2020). Quick response manufacturing and ergonomic consequences in manufacturing environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 788, 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/788/1/012031.
Cohen, L. (1995). Quality Function Development: How to Make QFD Work for You. Singapore: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
Maritan, D. (2015). Practical Manual of Quality Function Deployment. New York: Springer.
Ghufrani, M. S. (2010). Perancangan Alat Pengangkut Galon ke Dispenser dengan Pendekatan Metode Axiomatic Design. Surakarta: Unpublished.
Govers. (2001). QFD not just a tool but a way of quality management. Int J Prod Econ 69, 151-159.
Manchulenko, N. (2001). Appliying Axiomatic Design Principles to the House of Quality. Ontario.
Ulrich, K. T. (2001). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Produk. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Y, A. (1990). Quality function deployment (QFD) integrating customer requirements into Productivity Press. Portland.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/jasat.4.1.25-34
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright of Journal of Applied Sciences and Advanced Technology (JASAT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License