_2.png)
1.png)
2.png)
PENGEMBANGAN DESAIN PEMBELAJARAN SISTEM BASIS DATA
Abstract
Instructional design plays an important role in improving the quality of learning and the learning experience of students. But in fact, many universities (especially in the field of Information Technology) have not developed a structured learning design, so that the learning process becomes ineffective. This paper presents a database system learning design model using the Borg and Gall step 1 development model and adapting all stages in the Dick and Carey model. The research consists of four main stages: conducting a preliminary study to find information about the learning product to be developed; develop products based on research findings; conduct field trials on the products developed; and revise products based on test results. The product quality of the developed learning design model is measured from aspects of validity and aspects of practicality. Validity is assessed through expert validation (database system learning material expert, instructional design expert, graphic media expert, and linguist). The measurement results obtained an average value of 5 (on a scale of 1-5), which means that the product of the learning design model developed is included in the valid category. Practicality is measured based on the responses of students and teachers. The results of the practicality measurement obtained an average value of 4.56 (on a scale of 1-5), which means that the product of the learning design model developed is included in the Practically used category
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ACM, & Curricula, I. C. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2534860
Aditya, P. T. 2018. Pengembangan media pembelajaran matematika berbasis web pada materi lingkaran bagi siswa kelas VIII. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Komputasi, 15(1), 64-74.
Anas, M., & Rosidhah, E. 2020. Pengembangan Inovasi Pembelajaran Ekonomi Mikro Dengan Model Addie. Seminar Nasional Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntasi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Unp Kediri, 265-273.
Aptikom, & KKNI, B. 2015. Naskah Akademik KKNI Rumpun Ilmu Informatika dan Komputer.
Branch, R. M., & Dousay, T. A. 2015. Survey of Instructional Design, Fifth Edition. Association For Educational Communication and Technology.
Carey, W. D., & Carey J, L. 2015. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Eighth Edition. Pearson.
Chen, C., & Tzeng, G. 2011. Expert Systems with Applications Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(10), 12168–12179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011. 03.050
Chen, S. J. 2014. Instructional Design Strategies for Intensive Online Courses: An Objectivist-Constructivist Blended Approach. Journal of interactive online learning, 13(1), 72-85
Dewi, N. K. R. A., Jampel, I. N., & Agung, A. A. G. 2015. Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif IPA Dengan Model Assure Untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMP 1 Sawan. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 3(1): 1-11.
Farida, A., & Indah, R. P. 2019. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) Dengan Wolfram Mathematica. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 47-53.
Gall, M. ., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. 2007. Educational Research Eight Edition. Longman.
Gall, W. R. B. and M. D. 1983. Educational ResearchFourth Edition. New York: Longman.
Idris, A., & Rajuddin, M. 2012. The Trend of Engineering Education in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions of Learning towards Achieving Technological Development. 56(Ictlhe), 730–736. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.sbspro.201 2.09.710
Jasmy, M., Rahman, A., Arif, M., Ismail, H., & Nasir, M. 2014. Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Physics Instruction. 7(13), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ ies.v7n13p1 4
Joyce, B., Marsha, W., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching. EightEdition. Pearson.
Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. 2016. Applying Learning Theories and Instructional Design Models for Effective Instruction. Advances in physiology education, 40(2), 147-156.
Rienties, B., Nguyen, Q., Holmes, W., & Reedy, K. 2017. A review of ten years of implementation and research in aligning learning design with learning analytics at the Open University UK. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 33, 134–154.
Seels, B. B., & Rita C, R. 1994. Teknologi Pembelajaran: Definisi dan Kawasannya. Unit Percetakan UNJ.
Simamora, L., Hernaeny, U., & Safitri, N. D. 2020. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction (ARCS) terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 5(2), 245-252.
Stracke, C. M. 2019. Quality Frameworks and Learning Design for Open Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2): 180-203
Sugihartini, N., Agustini, K. 2017. Asesmen Otentik Sebagai Pendukung Desain Instruksional Jaringan Komputer Berstrategi Blended-Learning dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivistik. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 82-90.
Suparman, M. A. 2014. Desain Instruksional Modern. Erlangga.
Tung, K. Y. 2017. Desain Instruksional. Andi.
Widoyoko, S. E. P. 2019. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran (Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendididik Dan Calon Pendidik) (X). Pustaka Pelajar.
Yuanta, F. 2020. Pengembangan Media Video Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(02), 91-100.
Yuelan, L., Yiwei, L., Yuyan, H., & Yuefan, L. 2011. Study on teaching methods of database application courses. Procedia Engineering, 15, 5425–5428.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/instruksional.2.2.82-92
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.