THE CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS IN PRINTING MACHINE PROCESS OF THE MANUFACTURE OF CONTACT RUBBER SILICONE

Hendra Hendra; Yaman Parid; Hernadewita Hernadewita; Singgih Juniawan; Teuku Mirwan Saputra; D. Daruki

doi:10.24853/jurtek.15.1.141-150

THE CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS IN PRINTING MACHINE PROCESS OF THE MANUFACTURE OF CONTACT RUBBER SILICONE

Hendra Hendra, Yaman Parid, Hernadewita Hernadewita, Singgih Juniawan, Teuku Mirwan Saputra, D. Daruki

Abstract

The automotive industry is a key pillar of the global economy. At present, the level of public needs is high in the field of motor vehicle equipment and components, the automotive world continues to experience competition and quality problems in its growth. This paper describes a project carried out by an automotive component industry company, to analyze the problem of reducing product defects in the contact rubber silicone printing process. Problems occur in the printing process such as product malfunction, poor appearance, and incorrect shape. The data before the repair was taken from January 2021 to August 2021. After analyzing and making improvements with the Six Sigma method approach, the result was a decrease in defective products seen in September 2021 - April 2022 with a decrease in defective products from 18,088 pcs to 211 pcs or 3.9 sigma to 5.2 sigma. The results of the analysis found that the cause of the problem occurred at the level of the ink print in the container which was less than 6 millimeters. The problem was fixed by installing the sensor as mistake-proofing. So that it can increase the company's profit due to the decrease in product failure.

Keywords

Printing Process, Six Sigma, Mistake proofing, Quality Improvement

Full Text:

PDF

References

L. M. S. Farias, L. C. Santos, C. F. Gohr, and L. O. Rocha, “An ANP-based approach for lean and green performance assessment,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 143, pp. 77–89, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.004.

V. Swarnakar and S. Vinodh, “Deploying Lean Six Sigma framework in an automotive component manufacturing organization,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 267–293, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-06-2015-0023.

N. F. Habidin, S. Mohd Yusof, and N. Mohd Fuzi, “Lean Six Sigma, strategic control systems, and organizational performance for automotive suppliers,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 110–135, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-04-2015-0013.

A. Prashar, “Adoption of Six Sigma DMAIC to reduce cost of poor quality,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 103–126, 2014, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0018.

R. S. Reosekar and S. D. Pohekar, “Six sigma methodology: A structured review,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 392–422, 2014, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-12-2013-0059.

V. Narula and S. Grover, “Application of six sigma DMAIC methodology to reduce service resolution time in a service organization,” Accounting, vol. 1, pp. 43–50, 2015, doi: 10.5267/j.ac.2015.11.005.

H. Erbiyik and M. Saru, “Six Sigma Implementations in Supply Chain: An Application for an Automotive Subsidiary Industry in Bursa in Turkey.,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 195, pp. 2556–2565, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.447.

M. L. Meena, R. Jain, P. Kumar, and G. S. Dangayach, “Process improvement in an Indian automotive part manufacturing company : a case study S . Gupta,” vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 524–551, 2018.

P. Rana and P. Kaushik, “Initiatives of six-sigma in an automotive ancillary unit: A case study,” Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 569–580, 2018, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2018.4.033.

O. Sabbagha, M. N. A. Rahman, W. R. Ismail, and W. M. H. W. Hussain, “Impact of Quality Management Systems and After-sales Key Performance Indicators on Automotive Industry: A Literature Review,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 224, no. August 2015, pp. 68–75, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.401.

A. Krizanova, G. Lazaroiu, L. Gajanova, J. Kliestikova, M. Nadanyiova, and D. Moravcikova, “The effectiveness of marketing communication and importance of its evaluation in an online environment,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 24, pp. 1–19, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11247016.

S. C. Shit and P. Shah, “A review on silicone rubber,” Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 355–365, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s40009-013-0150-2.

N. Yadav, K. Mathiyazhagan, and K. Kumar, “Application of Six Sigma to minimize the defects in glass manufacturing industry: A case study,” J. Adv. Manag. Res., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 594–624, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JAMR-11-2018-0102.

P. M. Madhani, “Lean Six Sigma Deployment in Retail Industry: Enhancing Competitive Advantages,” SSRN Electron. J., no. January, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4002472.

A. Yadav and V. K. Sukhwani, “Quality Improvement by using Six Sigma DMAIC in an Industry,” vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 41–46, 2016.

M. P. Hetmańczyk and P. Michalski, “The aid of a mistake proofing with the use of mechatronic systems according to the poka-yoke methodology,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 837, pp. 399–404, 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.837.399.

A. P. Puvanasvaran, N. Jamibollah, and N. Norazlin, “Integration of poka yoke into process failure mode and effect analysis: A case study,” Am. J. Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1332–1342, 2014, doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2014.1332.1342.

N. Belu, L. M. Ionescu, A. Misztal, and A. Mazəre, “Poka Yoke system based on image analysis and object recognition,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 95, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012138.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/jurtek.15.1.141-150