Workload Analysis in Quantity Optimization Labor Using FTE And RSME Methods in the Packaging Department of a Pharmaceutical Company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24853/jurtek.17.1.63-70Keywords:
Workload analysis, Full Time Equivalent, Mental Effort Rating Scale.Abstract
Human Resources (HR) is one of the most important parts of a company, as the main driver to achieve company goals. The company requires a workload calculation to determine the workload received by its employees. The method used in this workload calculation is Full Time Equivalent and Rating Scale Mental Effort to calculate the workload received by employees of the solid packing department in each packaging process. The results of this study on the blistering, sleeving, IPC, sealing, and shippering processes are in the normal category with a workload value in the range of 1-1.28, while the cartoning process is in the overload category with a workload value of 1.60 . The results of the RSME value calculation on the blistering and sleeving processes get a weighting value in the range of 71-85 with a moderately large category, the IPC, sealing, and shipping processes get a weighting value in the range of 59-70 with a fairly large category, while the cartoning process gets a weighting value in the range of 86-100 with a large category. So it's necessary to add 1 employee so that the FTE value is distributed properly or the workload is normal and the RSME becomes fairly large.Downloads
References
Sunyoto, Danang. 2015. Human Resources Research . Jakarta: Buku Seru.
Zainal, Veithzal Rivai, H. Mansyur Ramly, Thoby Mutis, and Willy Arafah. 2019. Human Resource Management for Companies From Theory to Practice . Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada
Budiasa, I Komang. 2021. Workload and Human Resource Performance . Indonesia: Pena Pesada.
Rusby, Zulkifli. 2019. “Human Resource Management.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. 4:763–773.
Manuaba, Adyana. 2007. "A Total Approach in Ergonomics Is a Must to Attain Humane, Competitive and Sustainable Work Systems and Products." Journal of Human Ergology , 23–30.
Wignjoesubroto. 2012. Ergonomics, Motion and Time Study: Analysis Techniques for Increasing Work Productivity . University of North Sumatra Library.
Manuaba, Adyana. 1992. “The Influence of Ergonomics on Productivity.” In Seminar on Labor Productivity . Jakarta.
Hasibuan, MS P. 2017. Human Resource Management . Bumi Aksara.
Hastutiningsih, Artha Tri. 2019. “The Effect of Workload and Work Environment on Employee Performance Mediated by Work Stress.” Journal On Education , 1–8.
Koesmowidjojo, Suci R. Marih. 2017. Practical Guide to Compiling Workload Analysis . Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses.
Pranoto, L. Hardi, and Retnowati. 2015. Analysis of Company Human Resources Workload . Jakarta (ID): PPM Management.
Mahawati, Eni, Ika Yuniwati, Rolyana Ferinia, Puspita Puji Rahayu, Tiara Fani, Anggri Puspita Sari, Retno Astuti Setijaningsih, et al. 2021. Workload Analysis and Work Productivity . We Write Foundation .
Ramadhani, Aisyah Syifa. 2020. “Standard Time Measurement and Workload Analysis to Determine the Optimal Number of Workers in the Lipstick Product Printing Process.” Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering 12 (2): 177.
Ginting, Rosnani. 2017. Production System . First. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sutalaksana, R Anggawisastra, and J Tjakraatmadja. 2006. Work System Design Techniques . Bandung: ITB Bandung.
Kusuma, TYT, and MFS Firdaus. 2019. “Determination of the Optimal Number of Workers to Increase Work Productivity (Case Study: UD. Rekayasa Wangdi W).” Integrated Lab Journal,7(2) , 26–36.
Prima, Amanda Aulia, and Titia Izzati. 2018. “Workload Analysis of Chemical Analyst Workforce Using Full Time Equivalent Method in Technology Development Division of R&D-Analytical Development Department of PT XYZ.” PASTI Journal Volume XII No. 2, 154 - 168 12 (2): 154–168.
Yasmin, Zaskia Azhar, and Silvi Ariyanti. 2019. “Workload Analysis on Bd-Check Maintenance Using Full Time Equivalent Method.” Scientific Journal of Industrial Engineering 6 (1): 55–62. https://doi.org/10.24912/jitiuntar.v6i1.3024.
Sugiono, Hanna Stephanie, and Herry Christian Palit. 2016. “Determination of the Number of Workers in the MPC Department: A Case Study.” Titra Journal 4 (2): 223–28.
Sari, Amarria Dila, Fajri Hardiansa, and Muhamad Ragil Suryoputro. 2018. "Workload Assessment on Foundry SME to Enhance Productivity Using Full Time Equivalent." MATEC Web of Conferences 154:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815401081.
Oktaviana, Fira. 2021. “Analysis and Improvement of Mental Workload of Warping Machine Operators Using Nasa-Tlx and Rsme Methods (Case Study in Warping Division of PT. Sekar Lima Pratama),” 47.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
The author(s) of an article published in the Jurnal Teknologi retains ownership of the intellectual property rights in work (s).
PUBLISHING RIGHTS
The author(s) of an article published in the Jurnal Teknologi have unrestricted publication rights. The authors give the Jurnal Teknologi the right to publish the article and designate the Faculty of Engineering Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Publishing as the original publisher of the article.
LICENSING POLICY
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences is an open-access journal that follows the Creative Commons Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which states that:
Under this license, the reusers must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses users or their use.
Please take the time to read the whole license agreement (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). As long as reusers follow the license conditions, the owner cannot withdraw these freedoms. The following components are included under this license:
Attribution: Users must provide appropriate attribution, including a link to the license, and indicate whether or not they made any modifications. Users are free to do so reasonably, but not in a manner that indicates the licensee approves of their usage.
NonCommercial: Users may not use the material for commercial purposes.