INSTAGRAM DAN KOMUNIKASI POLITIK GENERASI Z DALAM PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN 2019 (STUDI PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS PERTAMINA)
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almond, Gabriel dan Verba, Sidney. (1963). The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Almond, Gabriel dan Verba, Sidney. (1984). Budaya Politik Tingkah Laku Politik dan Demokrasi di Lima Negara. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.
Annamaria, T. (2011). Z Generation : Clinical Psychological Phenomena and Socio-Psychological Aspect in The Information Age. Budapest: Tericum.
Ardipandanto, Aryojati. (2020). Dampak Politik Identitas pada Pilpres 2019: Perspektif Populisme. Jurnal Politica Vol. 11 No. 1. Diakses melalui: https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/politica/article/view/1582
Barkley and FutureCast. (2017). Getting to Know Gen Z: How The Pivotal Generation is Different from Millennials. Diakses melalui: https://www.millennialmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/FutureCast_The-Pivotal-Generation-7.pdf
Blackshaw, P. and Nazzaro M. (2006). Consumer Generated Media (CGM) 101: Word-of-Mouth in the Age of the Web-Fortified Consumer. New York: Nielsen.
Bell, David. (2007). Cyberculture Theorist. London: Routledge.
Bobok, D. (2016). Selective Exposure, Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers on Facebook. Central European University: Budapest. Diakses melalui: www.etd.ceu.hu
Bruns, Axe. (2019). It’s Not the Technology, Stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’ Metaphors Have Failed Us. Brisbane: Queensland University Technology. Diakses melalui:
http://snurb.info/files/2019/It%E2%80%99s%20Not%20the%20Technology%2C%20Stupid.pdf
Carpini, M. X. D., et al (2004). Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of The Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science Vol. 7: 315-344. Diakses melalui: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51993052
Dijk, Jan A.G.M. van. (2013). Digital Democracy: Vision and Reality. Innovation and The Public Sector. 19. 49-62. Diakses melalui: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287413539_Digital_democracy_Vision_and_reality
Dill, K. (2015). 7 Things Employers Should Know About The Gen Z Workforce. Forbes Magazine. Diakses melalui:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathryndill/2015/11/06/7-thingsemployers-shouldknow-about-the-gen-z-workforce/print/.
Dencker, J. C., Joshi, A., & Martocchio, J. J. (2008). Towards a theoretical framework linking generational memories to workplace attitudes and behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 180–187. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.007.
Flaxman, S. et al. (2016). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 80, Special Issue, 2016, pp. 298–320. Diakses melalui: https://5harad.com/papers/bubbles.pdf
Gerintya, S. (2018, Mar 6). Bagaimana Teknologi Memengaruhi Masa Depan Generasi Z. Tirto.id. Diakses melalui:
https://tirto.id/bagaimana-teknologi-memengaruhi-masa-depan-generasi-z-cFHP
Graber, Doris & Smith, James. (2005). Political Communication Faces the 21st Century. Journal of Communication. 55. 479-507. Diakses melalui: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231382284_Political_Communication_Faces_the_21st_Century/citation/download
Hacker dan J. van Dijk (Ed). (2000). Digital Democracy. Issues of Theory and Practice. London. Thousand Oaks CA, New Delhi: Sage.
Herdiansah, A. G. (2019). Political Participation Convergence in Indonesia: A Study of Partisan Volunteers in the 2019 Election. Jurnal Politik Vol. 4, No. 2. Diakses melalui: https://jurnalpolitik.ui.ac.id
Herring, Susan. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching online communities. Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, P. 338-376. Diakses melalui:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285786435_Computer-mediated_discourse_analysis_an_approach_to_researching_online_communities
Kaid, Lynda Lee (Ed.). 2004. Handbook of Political Communication Research. Routledge.
Katz, J. and Rice. R. (2002). Social Consequences of Internet Use, Access, Involvement, and Interaction. Cambridge MA, London: The MIT Press.
Kemp, Simon. Digital 2020: Indonesia. Datereportal.com. Diakses melalui: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-indonesia.
Koentjaraningrat. (1993). Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kutlu, A. (2018). The Internet and Politics: Transformation of Political Communication. International Conference on Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, p: 23-34. Diakses melalui:
https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/ICRHS-1-168.pdf
Leonard, C. (2020). Kenapa di Era Internet Masih Ada yang Percaya Teori Konspirasi?. Remotivi. Diakses melalui:
https://www.remotivi.or.id/mediapedia/597/kenapa-di-era-internet-masih-ada-yang-percaya-teori-konspirasi
Limm, Merlyna. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49:3, 411-427. Diakses melalui: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
Mcluhan, Marshall. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy, The Making of Typographic Man. University of Toronto: Toronto. Diakses melalui: https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-gutenberg-galaxy-the-making-of-typographic-man-d157958725.html
McLuhan, Marshall. (1964). Understanding Media : The Extensions of Man. MIT Press.
Mohammad, Yandi. (2019, Januari 29). Berebut Suara Pemilih Muda. Lokadata.id. Diakses
melalui: https://lokadata.id/artikel/berebut-suara-pemilih-muda
Newberry, C. (2019). 37 Instagram Stats That Matter for Marketers in 2020. Hootsuite.
Diakses melalui : https://blog.hootsuite.com/instagram statistics/#:~:text=Instagram%20will%20reach%20112.5%20million,million%20U.S.%20users%20in%202021.
Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity.
Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 979–987. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00268-0.
Norris, P. (2001) Digital Divide, Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet worldwide, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press
Norris, P. (2011). Political Communication. Dalam D. Caramani (ed.), Comparative Politics,
nd ed., p: 353-370. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nurudin. (2012). Pengantar Komunikasi Massa. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Ong, W. (1982), Orality and Literacy, the Technologizing of the Word. London and
NewYork: Methuen.
P, Ana & Ema, Ema & Lubis, Fardiah. (2020). Perang Tagar Di Ruang Virtual Diskursus
Politik Capres Pasca Debat Putaran Kedua. Jurnal Komunikasi Vol: 12 No. 1: 30. Diakses melalui: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343313371_Perang_Tagar_Di_Ruang_Virtual_Diskursus_Politik_Capres_Pasca_Debat_Putaran_Kedua
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: How The New Personalized Web Is Changing What We
Read And How We Think. New York: The Penguin Press Pariser, E. (2011). Diakses melalui:https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_ bubbles/transcript?language=en
Pramono, Sidik. (2019, Desember 30). Kemuda(h)an Berpemilu. Kompas.com.
Diakses melalui:https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/12/30/17541241/kemudahan-berpemilu?page=all
Pujileksono, Sugeng. (2015). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi Kualitatif. Malang:
Kelompok Intrans Publishing
Putra, F. A. D. (2020). Karakteristik Generasi Z di Yogyakarta Tahun 2019.
Universitas Sanata Dharma:Yogyakarta. Diakses melalui: https://repository.usd.ac.id/36688/2/151324021_full.pdf
Putra, Y. S. (2017). Theoretical Review: Teori Perbedaan Generasi. Jurnal Among Makarti.
Diakses melalui: https://jurnal.stieama.ac.id/index.php/ama/article/view/142
Putri, Astrid R. (2019 Des 24). Jumlah Pengguna Instagram di Indonesia Capai 61 Juta.
Kumparan.Diakses melalui: https://kumparan.com/kumparantech/jumlah-pengguna-instagram-di-indonesia-capai-61-juta-1sVVLzdQO0T/full
Rachfall, T., et al. (2014). The Information Overload Phenomenon: The Influence of Bad - and
(Ir)relevant Information. IJRET Vol. 3, Special Issue: 17, 2014. Diakses melalui: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276154707_THE_INFORMATION_OVERLOAD_PHENOMENON_THE_INFLUENCE_OF_BAD_-_AND_IR_RELEVANT_INFORMATION
Rachmawati, D. (2019). Welcoming Gen Z in Job World. Proceeding Indonesia Career Center
Network Summit IV. Diakses melalui: http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/ICCN/article/view/2721/1944
Rheingold, Howard. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic
Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Diakses melalui: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30874251_The_Virtual_Community
Shahreza, M dan El-Yana, Korry (2016). Etika Komunikasi Politik. Tangerang: Indigo Media.
Shapiro, Andrew. (2000). The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in
Charge and Changing the World We Know. New York: Public Affairs.
Sudarto, Anto. (2018). Pilpres dan Hard Cord Politik. Republika.co.id. Diakses melalui:
https://www.republika.co.id/berita/kolom/wacana/18/12/08/pjeacm440-pilpres-dan-hard-core-politik
Sugihartati, Rahma. (2014). Perkembangan Masyarakat Informasi dan Teori Sosial
Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana
Sugiono, Shiddiq. (2020). Fenomena Industri Buzzer di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Politik
Ekonomi Media. Jurnal Communicatus Vol. 4 No. 1: 47-66. Diakses melalui: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342498323_Fenomena_Industri_Buzzer_Di_Indonesia_Sebuah_Kajian_Ekonomi_Politik_Media
Sunstein, Cas (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, Cas. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, Kate. (2019 Jul 2). Instagram is Gen Z’s Go-To Source of Political News. Business
Insider.Diakses melalui:
https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-gets-its-political-news-from-instagram-accounts-2019-6?r=US&IR=T
Tsagarousianou, R. (1999). Electronic democracy: Rhetoric and reality. Communications: The
European Journal of Communication Research, 24 (2), pp. 189–208.
Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident,
Assertive, Entitled—and More Miserable Than Ever Before. New York: Free Press
Wallace, P. (2015). The Psychology of the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139940962
Warta Ekonomi. (20 Oktober 2019). 2 Media Sosial Ini Paling Dipercaya Gen Z, Bisa Tebak?.
WE Online. Diakses melalui: https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read252785/2-media-sosial-ini-paling-dipercaya-milenial-dan-gen-z-bisa-tebak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/pk.4.2.167-185
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
My Stats