- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving
- Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charge (APC)
- Open Access Statement
- Plagiarism Policy
- Licenses Statement
Focus and Scope
Fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal meliputi (namun tidak terbatas pada) elektronika, material elektronika, kendali, telekomunikasi, tenaga listrik dan komputer.
The focus and scope of the journal covers (but is not limited to) electronics, electronic material, controls, telecommunications, electric power and computer.
Section Policies
Teknik Elektro dan Elektronika
 Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
- Submission of paper. The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is usually via an online system such as Scholar-One Manuscripts. Occasionally, journals may accept submissions by email.
- Editorial office assessment. The journal checks the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. The quality of the paper is not assessed at this point.
- Appraisal by editor in chief. The Editor in Chief checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.
- EIC assign an associate editor (second editor). Some journals have Associate Editors who handle the peer review. If they do, they would be assigned at this stage.
- Invitation to reviewer. The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of acceptances is obtained – commonly this is 2, but there is some variation between journals.
- Respons to invitation. Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.
- Review is conducted. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it – or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered.
- Journal evaluates the reviewer. The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision.
- The decision is communicated. The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Whether the comments are anonymous or not will depend on the type of peer review that the journal operates.
- Next step. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor.
Publication Frequency
RESISTOR terbit pada Mei dan November.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Archiving
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Publication Ethics
Etika Publikasi
Pernyataan kode etik ilmiah ini merupakan pernyataan kode etik semua pihak yang terlibat dalam proses publikasi jurnal ilmiah ini yaitu pengelola, editor, mitra bestari, dan penulis. Pernyataan kode etika publikasi ilmiah ini berdasarkan Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah, yang pada intinya Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah ini intinya menjunjung tiga nilai etik dalam publikasi, yaitu (i) Kenetralan, yakni bebas dari pertentangan kepentingan dalam pengelolaan publikasi; (ii) Keadilan, yakni memberikan hak kepenulisan kepada yang berhak sebagai penulis; dan (iii) Kejujuran, yakni bebas dari duplikasi, fabrikasi, falsifikasi, dan plagiarisme dalam publikasi.
Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Pengelola Jurnal
- Menentukan nama jurnal, lingkup keilmuan, keberkalaan, dan akreditasi apabila diperlukan.
- Menentukan keanggotaan dewan editor.
- Mendefinisikan hubungan antara penerbit, editor, mitra bestari, dan pihak lain dalam suatu kontrak.
- Menghargai hal-hal yang bersifat rahasia, baik untuk pengabdi yang berkontribusi, penulis, editor, maupun mitra bestari.
- Menerapkan norma dan ketentuan mengenai hak atas kekayaan intelektual, khususnya hak cipta.
- Melakukan telaah kebijakan jurnal dan menyampaikannya kepada penulis, dewan editor, mitra bestari, dan pembaca.
- Membuat panduan kode berperilaku bagi editor dan mitra bestari.
- Mempublikasikan jurnal secara teratur.
- Menjamin ketersediaan sumber dana untuk keberlanjutan penerbitan jurnal.
- Membangun jaringan kerja sama dan pemasaran.
- Mempersiapkan perizinan dan aspek legalitas lainnya.
Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Editor
- Mempertemukan kebutuhan pembaca dan penulis,
- Mengupayakan peningkatan mutu publikasi secara berkelanjutan,
- Menerapkan proses untuk menjamin mutu karya tulis yang dipublikasikan,
- Mengedepankan kebebasan berpendapat secara objektif,
- Memelihara integritas rekam jejak akademik penulis,
- Menyampaikan koreksi, klarifikasi, penarikan, dan permintaan maaf apabila diperlukan,
- Bertanggung jawab terhadap gaya dan format karya tulis, sedangkan isi dan segala pernyataan dalam karya tulis adalah tanggung jawab penulis,
- Secara aktif meminta pendapat penulis, pembaca, mitra bestari, dan anggota dewan editor untuk meningkatkan mutu publikasi,
- Mendorong dilakukannya penilaian terhadap jurnal apabila ada temuan,
- Mendukung inisiatif untuk mengurangi kesalahan pengabdian kepada masyarakat dan publikasi dengan meminta penulis melampirkan formulir Klirens Etik yang sudah disetujui oleh Komisi Klirens Etik,
- Mendukung inisiatif untuk mendidik pengabdi tentang etika publikasi,
- Mengkaji efek kebijakan terbitan terhadap sikap penulis dan mitra bestari serta memperbaikinya untuk meningkatkan tanggung jawab dan memperkecil kesalahan,
- Memiliki pikiran terbuka terhadap pendapat baru atau pandangan orang lain yang mungkin bertentangan dengan pendapat pribadi,
- Tidak mempertahankan pendapat sendiri, penulis atau pihak ketiga yang dapat mengakibatkan keputusan tidak objektif,
- Mendorong penulis, supaya dapat melakukan perbaikan karya tulis hingga layak terbit.
Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Mitra Bestari
- Mendapat tugas dari editor untuk menelaah karya tulis dan menyampaikan hasil penelaahan kepada editor, sebagai bahan penentuan kelayakan suatu karya tulis untuk diterbitkan.
- Penelaah tidak boleh melakukan telaah atas karya tulis yang melibatkan dirinya, baik secara langsung maupun tidak
- Menjaga privasi penulis dengan tidak menyebarluaskan hasil koreksi, saran, dan rekomendasi dengan memberikan kritik, saran, masukan, dan rekomendasi
- Mendorong penulis untuk melakukan perbaikan karya tulis
- Menelaah kembali karya tulis yang telah diperbaiki sesuai dengan standar yang telah ditentukan.
- Karya tulis ditelaah secara tepat waktu sesuai gaya selingkung terbitan berdasarkan kaidah ilmiah (metode pengumpulan data, legalitas penulis, kesimpulan, dan lain-lain.).
Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Penulis
- Memastikan bahwa yang masuk dalam daftar penulis memenuhi kriteria sebagai penulis.
- Bertanggung jawab secara kolektif untuk pekerjaan dan isi artikel meliputi metode, analisis, perhitungan, dan rinciannya.
- Menyatakan asal sumber daya (termasuk pendanaan), baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung.
- Menjelaskan keterbatasan-keterbatasan dalam pengabdian kepada masyarakat.
- Menanggapi komentar yang dibuat oleh para mitra bestari secara profesional dan tepat waktu.
- Menginformasikan kepada editor jika akan menarik kembali karya tulisnya.
- Membuat pernyataan bahwa karya tulis yang diserahkan untuk diterbitkan adalah asli, belum pernah dipublikasikan di manapun dalam bahasa apapun, dan tidak sedang dalam proses pengajuan ke penerbit lain.
Article Processing Charge (APC)
Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Article Publication: 0.00 (IDR)
Open Access Statement
RESISTOR (Elektronika Kendali Telekomunikasi Tenaga Listrik Komputer) publishes fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Non-commercial use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited.
Benefits of open access for authors, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Authors retain copyright to their work
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
Plagiarism Policy
Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.
Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.
When plagiarism is identified, the Editor in Chief responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:
Level of Plagiaris
1.Minor :
A short section of another article is plagiarized without any significant data or idea taken from the other paper
Action : A warning is given to the authors and a request to change the text and properly cite the original article is made
2.Intermediate: A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized without proper citation to the original paper
Action: The submitted article is rejected and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for one year
3. Severe : A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized that involves reproducing original results or ideas presented in another publication
Action: The paper is rejected and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for five years.
It is understood that all authors are responsible for the content of their submitted paper as they all sign the Jurnal Teknologi Copyright Transfer Form. If a penalty is imposed for plagiarism, all authors will be subject to the same penalty.
If a second case of plagiarism by the same author(s) is identified, a decision on the measures to be enforced will be made by the Editorial board (Editor-in-Chief, and Editorial members) with the Chair of the Editor in Chief. The author(s) might be forbidden to submit further articles forever.
This policy applies also to material reproduced from another publication by the same author(s). If an author uses text or figures that have previously been published, the corresponding paragraphs or figures should be identified and the previous publication referenced. It is understood that in case of a review paper or a paper of a tutorial nature much of the material was previously published.
The author should identify the source of the previously published material and obtain permission from the original author and the publisher. If an author submits a manuscript to Jurnal Teknologi with significant overlap with a manuscript submitted to another journal simultaneously, and this overlap is discovered during the review process or after the publications of both papers, the editor of the other journal is notified and the case is treated as a severe plagiarism case. Significant overlap means use of identical or almost identical figures and identical or slightly modified text for one half or more of the paper. For self plagiarism of less than one half of the paper but more than one tenth of the paper, the case shall be treated as intermediate plagiarism. If self plagiarism is confined to the methods section, the case shall be considered as minor plagiarism.
If an author uses some of his previously published material to clarify the presentation of new results, the previously published material shall be identified and the difference to the present publication shall be mentioned. Permission to republish must be obtained from the copyright holder. In the case of a manuscript that was originally published in conference proceedings and then is submitted for publication in Jurnal Teknologi either in identical or in expanded form, the authors must identify the name of the conference proceedings and the date of the publication and obtain permission to republish from the copyright holder. The editor may decide not to accept this paper for publication.
However, an author shall be permitted to use material from an unpublished presentation, including visual displays, in a subsequent journal publication. In the case of a publication being submitted that was originally published in another language, the title, date and journal of the original publication must be identified by the authors, and the copyright must be obtained. The editor may accept such a translated publication to bring it to the attention of a wider audience. The editor may select a specific paper that had been published (e.g. a “historic” paper) for republication in order to provide a better perspective of a series of papers published in one issue of Jurnal Teknologi. This republication shall be clearly identified as such and the date and journal of the original publication shall be given, and the permission of the author(s) and the publisher shall be obtained.
The Jurnal Teknologi layout editor for the Journal is responsible for maintaining the list of authors subjected to penalties and will check that no authors of a submitted paper are on this list. If a banned author is identified, the layout editor will inform the Editor-in-Chief who will take appropriate measures. This policy will be posted on the web site with the instructions for submitting a manuscript, and a copy will be sent to the authors with the confirmation email upon initial receipt of their original manuscript. A sentence shall be added to the copyright transfer form to indicate that the author(s) have read the Plagiarism Policy.
Licenses Statement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal terindeks oleh :
