Students' Problems and Coping Strategies in Writing Undergraduate Theses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.7.2.131-140Keywords:
Problem, Coping Strategy, Undergraduate ThesisAbstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the factors contributing to students' challenges in undergraduate thesis writing within the English Education Study Program at Hamzanwadi University, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia. It further explores the strategies students employ to overcome these challenges. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, involving 36 eighth-semester students as participants. Data were collected through a close-ended questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to provide quantitative and qualitative insights. The findings indicate that psychological factors were the most significant challenge (78.72%), followed by sociocultural factors (16.51%) and linguistic factors (4.7%). To address these difficulties, students employed coping strategies, including identifying novel research topics and ideas through online books and journals, particularly from recent publications (within five years), and grounding their research in real-world issues. They also reviewed previous undergraduate theses, relevant literature, and methodological texts to strengthen their research framework. Additional measures included attending webinars on research methodology, enhancing internal and external motivation, engaging in intensive discussions with supervisors, and leveraging digital tools such as Grammarly and Quillbot for grammatical refinement and paraphrasing to ensure academic integrity. These findings offer valuable insights into the challenges of thesis writing and highlight practical strategies for students and educators to enhance the thesis-writing experience in higher education.References
Andrade, M., & Evans, N. W. (2013). Principles and practices for response in second language writing: Developing self-regulated learners. Routledge.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Blackwell.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Budiharso, T. (2009). The rhetoric of research writing. UIN-Malang Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2016). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Dwihandini, L. A., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suarnajaya, I. W. (2013). Analysis of the factors affecting undergraduate students’ difficulties in writing thesis. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(17), 19–24.
Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Heggen, K., Karseth, B., & Kyvik, S. (2010). The relevance of research for the improvement of education and professional practice. Higher Education, 60(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9291-0
Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge, and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000036
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Lee, J. F., & Tajino, A. (2008). Understanding students’ perceptions of difficulty with academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.02.001
Lestari, D. M. (2020). Students’ difficulties in writing undergraduate thesis at Muhammadiyah University in Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 2(1), 12–20.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Puspita, C. (2019). Factors influencing students’ difficulties in writing undergraduate thesis at IAIN Curup. Journal of English Language Studies, 4(1), 22–34.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Longman.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
