Framing Conflict in Political Discourse: Positive and Negative Politeness of Bassem Youssef and Piers Morgan’s Debate

Authors

  • Adinda Nurul AuliaPutri Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Agus Salim Mansyur Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Fourus Huznatul Abqoriyyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Keywords:

Politeness strategies, Political discourse, Media linguistics

Abstract

This study examines the positive and negative politeness strategies employed by Bassem Youssef and Piers Morgan in their discussion of the Israel-Hamas conflict in the YouTube video Wouldn’t You Resist? Bassem Youssef Returns for More on the Israel-Hamas War. Using Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory, this research explores how linguistic strategies manage face-threatening acts and influence audience perceptions. A qualitative descriptive approach is applied to analyze textual and contextual factors. Findings reveal that both speakers utilize various politeness strategies such as exaggeration, seeking agreement, and hedging to build rapport, mitigate conflict, and maintain discourse balance. This study highlights the significance of politeness in shaping political communication and fostering constructive discussions.  

References

Abitza, R., & Alfian, A. (2021). Analysis of Politeness Strategies Used by The Main Character In Home Alone 1. English Language, Linguistics, Literature, And Education Journal, 3(1), 35–57.

Aloni, M. (2022). Logic and conversation: the case of free choice. Semantics and Pragmatics, 15, 1–5.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Issue 4). Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2015). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. Routledge.

Locher, M. A., & Graham, S. L. (2021). Interpersonal Pragmatics.

Pratikno, K. N., Sudartinah, T., & Kurnia, N. I. (2016). A Pragmatic Analysis of Positive and Negative Politeness Strategies of Refusals in Richard Linklater’s Boyhood. Sastra Inggris-Quill, 5(2), 162–168.

Ramanathan, R., & Hoon, T. B. (2015). Application of Critical Discourse Analysis in Media Discourse Studies. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 21(3).

Suyono, M., & Andriyanti, E. (2021). Negative Politeness Strategies in What Would You Do? TV Show. Journal of Language and Literature, 21(2), 439–452.

Yule, G. (1996). [George_Yule]_Pragmatics(BookFi).pdf. 138.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): English Language in Focus (ELIF)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).