KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN PROPORSIONAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISTEMATIS DAN INTUITIF SISWA MTSN 2 BANDA ACEH

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 30, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.11.1.1-12
Keywords:
Intuitive Cognitive Style Systematic Cognitive Style Proportional Reasoning

Main Article Content

Erni Maidiyah
Syiah Kuala University
Trisna Isnanda Putri
Syiah Kuala University
Dwi Fadhiliani
Syiah Kuala University

Abstract

Research indicated that many students, from primary to secondary levels, still struggled to develop proportional reasoning. Numerous students encountered difficulties in formulating effective problem-solving strategies due to differences in cognitive styles. It was important to assess students' proportional reasoning abilities by considering whether they had systematic or intuitive cognitive styles. This study aimed to determine the proportional reasoning abilities of students with systematic and intuitive cognitive styles. The research was a qualitative descriptive study. The subjects of this study were four students in the seventh grade at MTsN 2 Banda Aceh. Data collection techniques included written tests and interviews. Data analysis was conducted in three stages: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that students with a systematic cognitive style can identify all information and quantities when understanding covariation, whereas students with an intuitive style tend to overlook some important information. Both groups recognise that the problems involve proportional situations and use the cross-multiplication strategy, but neither group can solve the problems using other strategies.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

References

Aisyah, S. 2015. Perkembangan peserta didik dan bimbingan belajar. Deepublish

Fadilla, D. M., & Siswono, T. Y. 2022. ”Penalaran proporsional siswa bergaya kognitif sistematif dan intuitif dalam menyelesaikan masalah numerasi”. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Vol. 11 (03), pp: 2301-9805.

Harahap, Tuti Khairani. 2022. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Sukoharjo: Media Group.

Hidayat, A., Amin, S., & Fuad, Y. 2017. “Profil penalaran proporsional siswa smp dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif sistematis dan intuitif”. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif Inovatif, Vol. 8 (2), pp: 162-170.

Ihsan, F. 2010. Filsafat ilmu. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.

Jena, P. C. 2014. “Cognitive Style and Problem Solve Ability of Undergraduate Students. International.” Journey of Educational Psychological Research, Vol. 3 (2), pp : 71-76.

Jusmiranti, & Susanah. 2019. “Profil penalaran proporsional siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya berpikir sekuensial konkret dan acak abstrak”. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Vol. 8 (2), pp: 223-231.

Johar, R., Yusniarti, S., & Saminan. 2018. “Analisis masalah penalaran proporsional pada buku pelajaran matematika Indonesia untuk SMP”. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika,Vol. 9 (1), pp: 55-68.

Khoyimah, I. N., & Susanah 2021. “Profil berpikir relasional siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif sistematis-intuitif”. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Vol. 10 (2), pp: 396-409.

Lamon, S. J. 2012. “ Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding : essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers”. Routledge

Martin, L. P. 1998. The cognitive style inventory. The Pfeiffer Library.

Mudlofir, H.A. (2021). Desain pembelajaran inovatif: dari teori ke praktik. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Patel, J. 2016. “Cognitive styles of secondary level school teachers of mathematics”. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, Vol. 3 (4), pp: 2349-3429.

Sagiv, L., Amit, A., & Arieli, S. 2013. “Not all great minds think alike: sysetematic and intuitive cognitive style”. Journal of Personality, Vol. 82 (5), pp: 402-417.

Siswono, T.Y.E. 2019. Paradigma penelitia pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wahyuni, Indah. 2022. Penalaran proporsional. Bantul: Lembaga Ladang Kata