The Implementation of e-Feedback in Improving Students’ Writing Quality: the Importance and Perspective

Tazkiyatunnafs Elhawwa, Sabarun Sabarun, Mutiarani Pionera, A’am Rifaldi Khunaifi

Abstract


In the digital age, where conventional methods of feedback may no longer be sufficient, e-feedback presents a modern approach that aims to provide clarity and efficiency. This study investigates the effectiveness of electronic feedback, or e-feedback, in enhancing students' writing skills. This descriptive qualitative study involved 25 students from a university in Central Kalimantan and used a diverse range of data collection methods, including open-ended and closed-ended questionnaires, observations, interviews, and analysis of student papers. Throughout ten instructional meetings, participants expressed positive feedback regarding the e-feedback method, highlighting its time-saving nature, clarity, and user-friendliness. They particularly valued the opportunity to correct their mistakes, with the use of color-coded highlights to understand different types of errors adding an engaging element to the feedback process. While the advantages of e-feedback were widely recognized, some participants noted a desire for more verbal explanations to accompany their written feedback. Overall, the findings indicate that e-feedback not only boosts students' enthusiasm and participation in writing classes but also significantly improves their writing skills.


Keywords


e-feedback; writing skills; student engagement; higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


AbdRahman, S., Salam, A., & Yusof, M. (2014). Screencast feedback practice on students’ writing. In Asia-Pacific Social Science Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289396637

Ai, H. (2017). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment. ReCALL, 29(3), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401700012X

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2014). Introduction to Research in Education. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Binglan, Z., & Jia, C. (2010). The Impact of Teacher Feedback on the Long-term Improvement in the Accuracy of EFL Student Writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press), 33(2).18-34.

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of second language writing, 14(3), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001.

Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific journal of second and foreign language education, 1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y

Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302

Chong, I. (2018). Interplay among technical, socio-emotional and personal factors in written feedback research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1317712

Elhawwa, T., Rukmini, D., Mujiyanto, J., & Sutopo, D. (2018, September). The learners perceive of written corrective feedback in writing multicultural class. In International Conference on Science and Education and Technology 2018 (ISET 2018) (pp. 537-542). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iset-18.2018.108

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal: An electronic refereed journal for foreign and second language educators, 1(1), 13-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

Fithriani, R. (2017). Indonesian students' perceptions of written feedback in second language writing (Doctoral dissertation, The University of New Mexico). http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/educ _llss _etds/87

Fong, N. S., Wan-Mansor, W. F. A., & Salam, A. R. (2014). Employing written corrective feedback in teaching writing. In 1st International Education Postgraduate Seminar Proceedings Vol (Vol. 3, pp. 1-8).

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in higher education, 27(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099368

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of second language writing, 12(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.

Lavolette, E., Polio, C., & Kahng, J. (2015). The accuracy of computer-assisted feedback and students’ responses to it. Language, Learning & Technology, 19(2), 50-68. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2015/lavolettepoliokahng.pdf.

Lee, I. (2013). Second language writing: Perspectives of a teacher educator-researcher. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(22), 435-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.08.005

Mubarok, H. (2012). The use of peer feedback strategy to motivate students in narrative text writing. English Education Journal, 2(2), 162-168. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/677

Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16-31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001

Norcini, J. (2010). The power of feedback. Medical education, 44(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03542.x

Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903201651

Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language teaching, 37(2), 87-105. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002216

Papanis, E., Giavrimis, P., & Papani, E. M. (2010). The contribution of the internet into learning. Review of European Studies, 2(1), 54-60. http://doi.org/10.5539/res.v2n1p54

Saadi, Z. K., & Saadat, M. (2015). EFL learners' writing accuracy: Effects of direct and metalinguistic electronic feedback. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2053-2063. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0510.11

Sain, N., Rajendran, C. B., Yoke, C. S. K., Kamaludin, P. N. H., Nawi, S., & Yusof, S. M. (2013, March). Utilising e-mail for online corrective feedback in academic writing among ESL undergraduates. In 3rd International Conference on Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. March 2013, Bangkok, Thailand https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263852239

Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601

Shirazi, M. A., & Shekarabi, Z. (2014). The role of written corrective feedback in enhancing the linguistic accuracy of Iranian Japanese learners’ writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2014.20426

Szlachta, B., Polok, K., & Bieńkowska, I. (2023). The Importance of Feedback in Improving Students' Writing Skills with the Assistance of New Technologies. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 12(1), 357-386. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2023.1223.16

Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249

Wiggins, G. (2012). Effective Feedback. Educational leadership.

Wijayanti, P., Bharati, D. A. L., & Mujiyanto, J. (2015). The use of written feedback technique to improve the practice of grammar for sentence writing competence. English Education Journal, 5(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/6846

Yeh, S. W., & Lo, J. J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52(4), 882-892. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.014

Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of mind mapping strategy in Malaysian university English test (MUET) Writing. Creative Education, 7(04), 619-626. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.74064




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.7.1.11-18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracting/Indexing

     
   
     

 

English Language in Focus (ELIF) is published by

  


This work is licensed under

   

 

Powered by Puskom-UMJ